Why is the Cruise Chaser mount from the Mogstation?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BunniEclair

My bad! You’re so right!. They don’t listen to you specifically when you cry all day about male viera height.

---

Lol bringing up other topics into this one.Way to be off topic and stifle discussion but no, there’s many other things, and that im sure you willfully ignore while you try to blindly spread misinformation and false praise.Heres something your oh so trustworthy devs said. "In older MMOs, such as Ultima Online, there was a house maintenance fee you had to pay weekly, but in FFXIV: ARR we decided against this system. Similarly, these older MMOs also had a system where your house would break down if you didn’t log in after a while in order to have you continue your subscription, but this is a thing of the past and we won't have any system like that." Yeah they really upheld this huh? :p

Ironic. People was asking for this mount for ages and devs added it, only in way what people don't want. Well my 1cent opinion on this... Really low move from Enix. Raid mounts really should not be in Mog Store. I don't mind if they make custom mounts for shop but add raid boss as mount in store, that's ''cheap'' move make money. Did not really expect Enix to do this. Minus ''cool'' points from me for sure.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Reaperking386

Who the hell cares? it is a mount. If this was World of Warcraft and we had nothing but recolor mounts then I would see the anger, but we have so many unique mounts with so many avenues. How about that polar bear we just got? They give us a new mount atleast every patch and you guys are calling it BS the moment a mount makes it on the Mog-Station. You know what I am going to say when I see the mount? "Oh look! That person got the mount from the store.

---

LMAO the Polar Bear IS a reskin! hahahahahahah

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Valkyrie_Lenneth

OK, there are "server issues" the server software, and there are "server issues" the server hardware.


Most of our issues are software. Things like i/o limitations are hardware. Some of them are mixed.

---

And they had ... how many years to fix those issues? That is the problem i have with Square Enix's behavior.



Cheers

https://slm-assets.secondlife.com/as...jpg?1457265608


Hell, I would spend 50 bucks on a full 5 piece sin eater bodysuit if they add it on the mog station. Its just a mount. And its not overpriced like the ugly whale.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by KizuyaKatogami

Lol bringing up other topics into this one.Way to be off topic and stifle discussion but no, there’s many other things, and that im sure you willfully ignore while you try to blindly spread misinformation and false praise.Heres something your oh so trustworthy devs said. "In older MMOs, such as Ultima Online, there was a house maintenance fee you had to pay weekly, but in FFXIV: ARR we decided against this system. Similarly, these older MMOs also had a system where your house would break down if you didn’t log in after a while in order to have you continue your subscription, but this is a thing of the past and we won't have any system like that." Yeah they really upheld this huh? :p

---

Damn, you sure showed me. It’s not like they’ve consistently tried to fix the housing situation, and continue to do so. And they totally haven’t addressed why they couldn’t keep their word on not having housing demolished, such as limited server space and increasing demand from active players to own a house. It’s not like they created apartments which don’t demolish. And they certainly don’t put housing timers on pause during times when extraordinary circumstances affect large swaths of the playerbase and their ability to log in.

You’re right. Not trustworthy, totally ready to screw you over at a moment’s notice. Can’t wait for the game to be entirely P2W in a year or two.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Reaperking386

Who the hell cares? it is a mount. If this was World of Warcraft and we had nothing but recolor mounts then I would see the anger, but we have so many unique mounts with so many avenues. How about that polar bear we just got? They give us a new mount atleast every patch and you guys are calling it BS the moment a mount makes it on the Mog-Station. You know what I am going to say when I see the mount? "Oh look! That person got the mount from the store.

---

agreed! too mutch drama for just a simple mount.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BunniEclair

Damn, you sure showed me. It’s not like they’ve consistently tried to fix the housing situation, and continue to do so. And they totally haven’t addressed why they couldn’t keep their word on not having housing demolished, such as limited server space and increasing demand from active players to own a house. It’s not like they created apartments which don’t demolish. And they certainly don’t put housing timers on pause during times when extraordinary circumstances affect large swaths of the playerbase and their ability to log in.

You’re right. Not trustworthy, totally ready to screw you over at a moment’s notice. Can’t wait for the game to be entirely P2W in a year or two.

---

It’s literally taken them 6-7 years to address the placard situation. There’s no excuse for that. Let’s not forget their promise about viera and hrothgar hair being added this expansion…or how they said no door bosses for savage….

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fellgon

agreed! too mutch drama for just a simple mount.

---

More like same drama.

Fat moogle was added in the store in 2016 for $29, and there was a thread then.

It'll blow over in a few days.

im sorry but no, this is not ok.
stop defending this type of thins couse " they need money", so far it was okay and on a nice " edge ".
now they take a step to far imo, no excuse is going to change my mind.

with this white knight mind set we would still be on 1.0 , stop defending what has no other point than to milk the player base.
it is not cool and should be not supported by the player base, period.

stop being sheeps.