FFXIV on the Vita?

Printable View

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

12-29-2012, 08:20 AM
ShinigamiKayla

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kirito

you shouldn't forget P4G and hatsune miku project diva f

eh Persona series and Atlus in general I'm not fond of their games they are usualy all dungeon crawlers... OH HEY KAYLA WHATS WRONG WITH DUNGEON CRAWLERS... I hate that its usualy a single tower with 100-200 floors with no movement anywhere beyond and single area... I'm sorry I like a variety of areas then 1 single thing... and project diva... come on... how the hell did people enjoy the first few games... (an extreme hatred for anything miku hatsune rages within this one) anyways beyond that rant...

God Eater 2 is on my #1 Vita wishlist because God Eater Burst had to be one of the best things I've ever played o.o/
12-29-2012, 08:26 AM
Yukagama

am still wating for FFXI to be on the vita.
12-29-2012, 08:27 AM
Kirito

@Kayla ok... if thats how you feel. I personally play P4G for the story
12-29-2012, 08:28 AM
Valmonte

if i could get a tales of title and a few FF remakes, id be happy with my purchase of a nice touch screen paperweight. sadly all we do have is TBA dates.
12-29-2012, 08:30 AM
Linkurrra

Quote:

Originally Posted by Valmonte

XI opened up a loop whole in the whole Xbox subscriber model, you don't need gold for online play, in short they don't want developers to take advantage of this. so all online traffic must come from gold subscribers, you can see where this is going to be an issue for subscription based games.

here's something interesting about the con art at Microsoft, did you know your paying Microsoft to use your bandwidth to host there ads. in any other circumstance MS would be paying you for generating there multimillion dollar ad traffic.

Ah, thats the type of corporate answer I was looking for. That makes total sense. It all boils down to the money and keeping other ppl from taking a portion of it or using their network without paying for it.

However it is interesting how Microsoft keeps ppl thinking that their network is just enough better to be worth paying for.
Although I guess Sony followed suit with their Playstation Plus thing. They both have perks, but not enough for me to pay $50 a year for :P They make enough on the micro-transaction markets they created. :P
12-29-2012, 08:30 AM
Kirito

Quote:

Originally Posted by Valmonte

if i could get a tales of title and a few FF remakes, id be happy with my purchase of a nice touch screen paperweight. sadly all we do have is TBA dates.

Tales of hearts demo recently went on psn but japan psn only so far... Also SE recently had a final fantasy campaign on psn showing all ps1 ff games, although that is also japan psn only...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Linkurrra

Ah, thats the type of corporate answer I was looking for. That makes total sense. It all boils down to the money and keeping other ppl from taking a portion of it or using their network without paying for it.

However it is interesting how Microsoft keeps ppl thinking that their network is just enough better to be worth paying for.
Although I guess Sony followed suit with their Playstation Plus thing. They both have perks, but not enough for me to pay $50 a year for :P They make enough on the micro-transaction markets they created. :P

at least we can still play online without subscribing to ps plus for sony
12-29-2012, 08:34 AM
Valmonte

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kirito

Tales of hearts demo recently went on psn but japan psn only so far... Also SE recently had a final fantasy campaign on psn showing all ps1 ff games, although that is also japan psn only...

yeah Namco translation usually take like 3-4 console generations, thats what im afraid of. as for SE still waiting on that FF10 remastered edition that was on the sony list of soon after launch titles
12-29-2012, 08:40 AM
Valmonte

Quote:

Originally Posted by Linkurrra

Ah, thats the type of corporate answer I was looking for. That makes total sense. It all boils down to the money and keeping other ppl from taking a portion of it or using their network without paying for it.

actually there network simply consists of Gamer profile's Achievments and a Marketplace, all the heavy lifting is done by the 360 owners on there network. Xbox live is just another MS scam.

imaging the shit storm that would happen if steam charged you 8 bucks a month to play the games you purchased from them for $50. thats what xbox live and PS plus are, there steams who have legalized a fraudulent activity of charging you to access the full content of your game.
12-29-2012, 08:54 AM
Firon

Quote:

Originally Posted by Valmonte

XI opened up a loop whole in the whole Xbox subscriber model, you don't need gold for online play, in short they don't want developers to take advantage of this. so all online traffic must come from gold subscribers, you can see where this is going to be an issue for subscription based games.

here's something interesting about the con art at Microsoft, did you know your paying Microsoft to use your bandwidth to host there ads. in any other circumstance MS would be paying you for generating there multimillion dollar ad traffic.

I wouldn't want XIV on xbox anyway its shit can't even use stuff you payed for already unless you have gold.

Quote:

actually there network simply consists of Gamer profile's Achievments and a Marketplace, all the heavy lifting is done by the 360 owners on there network. Xbox live is just another MS scam.

imaging the shit storm that would happen if steam charged you 8 bucks a month to play the games you purchased from them for $50. thats what xbox live and PS plus are, there steams who have legalized a fraudulent activity of charging you to access the full content of your game.

PS + is nothing like live its robbery like Xbox live ps + is only a bonus if anything free games + discounts year around. Xbox live will block your Netflix if you don't have gold and games you have played for. Your net is down for some reason all your games turn into demos.
12-29-2012, 09:03 AM
Valmonte

Quote:

Originally Posted by Firon

I wouldn't want XIV on xbox anyway its shit can't even use stuff you payed for already unless you have gold.

PS + is nothing like live its robbery like Xbox live ps + is only a bonus if anything free games + discounts year around. Xbox live will block your Netflix if you don't have gold and games you have played for. Your net is down for some reason all your games turn into demos.

Trust me Sony wants a slice of that Live pie, and have been edging towards it ever so closely. i wouldn't be surprised if the PSN gets a major revision a few day before the PS4 is launched.
12-29-2012, 09:06 AM
xXHalloweenTrixXx

Quote:

Originally Posted by Valmonte

this isn't true at all the PS3 is swimming in many RPG series, the 360 trailing in second, with the wii being in last. now RPG's on the portables is vastly different the DS and 3DS have the lead here, while the Vita is pretty much all shit ports of shooters...or sports, its RPG's come from PS1 Classics and a hand full of Sony chosen PSP titles.

... I said MMORPGs not RPGs...
12-29-2012, 11:55 AM
Yrusama

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shura

Considering there is a Alpha version logo on the bottom left, im assuming its just playing a video of ARR gameplay in fullscreen.

They already had to descale the game so much to get it to run on ps3, and i think they even said how they had to crop the resolution or something then stretch it just for it to work so doubt they'll waste time with a vita port.

Agreed. The Vita may be able to render a video of the game, but it would not be able to render the game itself without scaling it back further.

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page