How many people use Linux? Of that, how many will play FFXIV?
And of those using Linux, how many have alternative numbers?
Simply not economical to spend the effort for returns so miniscule.
Linux has its niche, and its not gaming.
Printable View
How many people use Linux? Of that, how many will play FFXIV?
And of those using Linux, how many have alternative numbers?
Simply not economical to spend the effort for returns so miniscule.
Linux has its niche, and its not gaming.
Making ports is all about time and money. It will never get a port if SE does not think enough people will buy it for that OS there fore it's a waste of time, and they will loose money in the long run.
Yes, it isn't. But it's much more work to port something from DX to openGL (full rewrite) than making adjustments to the C code (loading different libs, etc) IMHO.
The only anecdotal thing here is you fanaticism.
Newsflash: Linux system updates require restarts just like windows system updates. While linux updaters typically include system AND program updates, it's system updates only on windows, which is why in most cases (no, not every time) you will have to restart your system. A point you are deliberately overlooking if you ask me.
You knowledge about windows coming to a halt on appcrashes seems to come from win98....
And I had my share of kernel panics and misbehaving drivers (rt2870, anyone?) on linux just like I had my share of BSODs on windows. Not to mention it's much easier to break a linux system if you don't know what you're doing.
Don't poke the gears and it won't crash. The only times windows 7 BSODs is when a driver misbehaves, which isn't the fault of the OS but the driver maintainer.Quote:
These are less of an issue for home users, but they're still a thing and I heavily dislike Windows for the way it manages crashes.
Each OS has it's share of quirks, no need to hate on either. The only question here is, which quirks are easier to live with for you, which is an individual decision.
For me, software under linux is often lacking completeness. They implement partial support for something and move on once basic functionality is working. I refuse to bend over backwards just because the software is free.
There is nothing hard about linux. For a user who just wants to do office and surfing as well as watching some videos or listening to music, the experience is not different from windows. If you think otherwise, then it's maybe time to try out a recent linux distribution.
Not before Mac OSX. And iPad 3.
I agree linux isn't hard but to get a larger mainstream user base the community needs to quit saber rattling that people who don't get how something works on it are idiots and start working on teaching them how to do it properly. I was using his response to the other player as a prime example of an ill will attitude to those who can't grasp at it as well.
That's all well and good, but who are you going to run into first? More then likely it will be the man with an insult catered directly to you not getting it the second it existed.
I see the wrong people finding curious parties about various subjects all the time. Sufficed to say do you think belg would look favorably towards linux after the other guy's responses? Personally I see it as doubtful
Being prejudiced against linux just because of that is silly. If we were to follow this example, we should quit playing FFXIV, since it's by a Japanese company and we all know that the Japanese only want our money and don't want to play with us, just like all Americans are fat and Germans are greedy bastards wanting to build the 4th Reich.... right?
Seriously though, people you describe are everywhere, but they are certainly not a majority.
Whaaaat? The linux community is by and large one of the most supportive and nice communities on the internet. It's generally only when you preface your discussions with "Linux sucks because" or "I hate linux because" or something similar, that they turn nasty.
From my experience Linux community isnt that bad, they all give you instructions like you have a CS degree though.
(Doesnt bother me since I've studied in the subject, but its bad if you wanted the fresh noobies :P)
Linux's niche is anything it gets molded into.
I've had better performance running certain games on Linux before, as bad as that is.
Hang in there Linux gamers! As a OS X gamer I feel your pain, but Valve is making leaps and bounds in progress to support Linux and OS X(their recent efforts to build a Steam client on Linux demonstrates their committedness). If Valve proves that gaming on those platforms is profitable more developers will be more likely to support them.
No thanks. If you want to play games that aren't emulators or indie, get a Windows partition and some good hardware. While I understand that Linux is for those that are less keen on spending money (see the big debacle about people thinking that Valve's Linux ports should be free, and how charging is wrong), ARR is a commercial game with standards to follow. Porting it to linux would be a waste of time and resources for a not-very-visible minority. You'd be better off porting it to Android first.