Scholar's Identity Transformation

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AmiableApkallu

:confused: Temperance's animation already makes me think "angel".

It's the new SCH thing needs to be more obviously fairy-butterfly-pixie inspired. (Feo Ul exists. Just sayin'.)

---

when I think angel wings, I think actual wings, like white and feathery, none of which Temperance have. It also uses blue, green,purple rainbowy colours, which goes better with the fairy aesthetic.

Temperance also gives me more of a butterfly vibe, which again is more of a fairy thing

I wasn't expecting anything from the LL regarding healers, I was so mad with EW's lack of changes I quit for pretty much the whole expac. But forcing attire onto people? Especially attire more fit for WHM? That's a low blow not even I expected! They really should make it optional, or adjust it to be more thematic with SCH being a military tactician.

I agree with OP, the shown transformation looks like a WHM skill.

Also, male characters, people who do not like to become fancy fairies, people who were drawn to the militaristic theme going on since ARR to a more Admiral Stukov looking, minus the ribbons. More of that

After reading Japanese forum it looks like they don't like the transformation ether. Sure, glad I don't play Scholar because I sure don't want to transform into an angel.

If sch has to gave a form, kinda want it with fairy wings instead... but if we are going the seraph route shouldnt it have least 2 pairs of feathery wings instead of the 1?...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hynaku

After reading Japanese forum it looks like they don't like the transformation ether. Sure, glad I don't play Scholar because I sure don't want to transform into an angel.

---

Glad to hear there is a united front against the angel nightgown.

Can't have your dots, can't have selene, (almost) can't have energy drain and now we can't even have your own glam.

Trying really hard to apply Occam's razor but at this point im genuinely considering if one of the devs just hate SCH.

I know it's a meme that all healers are homogenized and play the same, but the design being more angel-like than fairy-like really gives me the impression that whoever is designing SCH wants to design the job like WHM...

I like Seraphism as a skill concept, but I don't get why SCH got more of a WHM-theme than a SCH theme. Especially with the robes. They look like priest robes, which is more synonymous with WHM than SCH. Is SCH really designed to be like WHM?

Do you remember when ShB was about to launch, the great homogenization of healers that was supposed to be for balancing so they would be able to build upon the new base ?
Do you remember when EW was about to launch, when they doubled down and homogenized some more and split it sub-roles, yet delivered nothing worth what was lost. At least they released SGE and they promised new effects on the AoE, akin to Holy's stun so each jobs would get it's own feel ?
Do you remember when DT was about to launch, when they still haven't delivered any of that ?