[Request] Please add to the partyfinder a "Stone-Sea-Sky" requirement option

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Vstarstruck

this isn't the point -.-

---

heh, it's the point I'm making. All your doing is adding an arbitrary tag that ultimately tells you nothing about the player because their is no way to know if it's legit or not. It may be against the ToS for someone to share their account info to clear it but so are a lot of things and people still do it.

The solution is to build a static. Then you'll know if your teammates are up to snuff. A SSS requirement won't help the pug life.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DeaconMoore

heh, it's the point I'm making. All your doing is adding an arbitrary tag that ultimately tells you nothing about the player because their is no way to know if it's legit or not. It may be against the ToS for someone to share their account info to clear it but so are a lot of things and people still do it.

The solution is to build a static. Then you'll know if your teammates are up to snuff. A SSS requirement won't help the pug life.

---

maybe next time you should be more clear with your posts, I had no idea you where talking about account sharing.

How come I do not see you fighting off that we should not have ilevel requirments for the plubic DF or the setting ni the PF? Hey it is "adding an arbitrary tag that ultimately tells you nothing about the player because their is no way to know if it's legit or not" since you can easily chat and bypass the ilevel requirements, like not having a good weapon but meet the average.

This is not a good argument against this idea, if people want to use "adding an arbitrary tag that ultimately tells you nothing about the player because their is no way to know if it's legit or not" they should be allowed to, *points to skip soar or disband meme*

Look how SE made you watch CS n MSQ roulette, so your "build a static" comment is also invalid. You can also apply such arguments to people asking better requirements for the DF (letting people enter runs where they are way too low in ilevel because the DF does not have requirements for all runs)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Vstarstruck

maybe next time you should be more clear with your posts, I had no idea you where talking about account sharing.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DeaconMoore

Not really. All you're doing is giving someone a hoop to jump thru that you yourself did not see them jump through. You have no idea how hard it was for them to jump thru it or if they even did it themselves. All you know is they have a SSS. It doesn't mean they will try and not try to be carried instead.

---

*shrug* thought I was pretty clear about that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Vstarstruck

How come I do not see you fighting off that we should not have ilevel requirments for the plubic DF or the setting ni the PF? Hey it is "adding an arbitrary tag that ultimately tells you nothing about the player because their is no way to know if it's legit or not" since you can easily chat and bypass the ilevel requirements, like not having a good weapon but meet the average.

---

Well, for one this thread is about SSS not item level. For another your average isn't "cheating" just because your weapon isn't good. It's just that, an average. One of the jobs of a good raid leader is to check the gear of newcomers to the group. Failure to do so is the raid leaders failure.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Vstarstruck

This is not a good argument against this idea, if people want to use "adding an arbitrary tag that ultimately tells you nothing about the player because their is no way to know if it's legit or not" they should be allowed to, *points to skip soar or disband meme*

---

Hey, if you want to use useless requirements for your groups I won't stop you, I was merely pointing out the flaw of it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Vstarstruck

Look how SE made you watch CS n MSQ roulette, so your "build a static" comment is also invalid. You can also apply such arguments to people asking better requirements for the DF (letting people enter runs where they are way too low in ilevel because the DF does not have requirements for all runs)

---

Ok, you lost me here. How on earth does SE making the cut scenes in MSQ roulette unskippable make building a static invalid? With a static you should have a pool of people you can trust and rely on to progress thru content. With a pug you have no idea how good or bad the others are until you start.

MSQ CS's fit in this how?:confused: