Please do NOT alter Dark Knight AF for female characters.

Considering Drk is a tank, I doubt they will have it be revealing at all. Drg could get away with it because they are a DD. I can understand wanting less armor as a class whose signature moves involving jumping all over the place.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Zosimo

Really? People are worried about realism in a fantasy game? lol.

There are male version armors that are just as revealing as some of the female versions and not to mention there are some very feminine style armors in-game that males end up wearing due to the stats. When given those facts into account, I hope the female armor version shows a good amount of skin.

---

Why can't there be more than one version of an armor. I'm not opposed to the one in the OP but it sure wouldn't be my choice to wear it. It'll get glamoured. I find it something I just won't wear personally and why do I have to glamour it? How about making some feminine designs and the one in the OP is far from it.

Of course it's gonna be revealing. The majority want fanservice so fanservice is what they will have.

A few vocal voices on the forum isn't going to change that.

Fantasia to a male character.

Female versions of armor in this game are hardly as revealing as gear in many other MMOs.

I'm on the other side of the fence. I want my male characters to have access to the more revealing versions that women get to wear. I'm disappointed by the lack of sexy man-cleavage on the Scylla set and the generic crafter body, aswell as others. So, I think both covered and uncovered options should be available to both genders.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Zosimo

Really? People are worried about realism in a fantasy game? lol.

There are male version armors that are just as revealing as some of the female versions and not to mention there are some very feminine style armors in-game that males end up wearing due to the stats. When given those facts into account, I hope the female armor version shows a good amount of skin.

---

I thought this thread was doing so good until this post and the distasteful "joke" one about the Middle Eastern women fully covering their bodies...

So you think just because SOME of the male armor is just as revealing as female armor that the female DRK AF should be automatically more revealing?

For the most part, I like how this game mostly has gender-equal armor types (aside from a few exceptions like the previously mentioned DRG AF)... and in some cases, the male armor is more revealing! That's awesome!

But yes. I think the DRK AF armor will look exactly the same on men and women. I particularly liked a post someone made that said something like, "How do we know that isn't a woman under that armor in the reveal picture?"

Edit: Okay, in the process of typing this some other posts I didn't like popped up. Bleh. It was doing so well...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BearGrylls

I'm on the other side of the fence. I want my male characters to have access to the more revealing versions that women get to wear. I'm disappointed by the lack of sexy man-cleavage on the Scylla set and the generic crafter body, aswell as others. So, I think both covered and uncovered options should be available to both genders.

---

I truly have to agree. I'd like to start seeing more skin shown for male characters.

well on a brighter note, Ninja AF won't be just armor pads and skin for women, it will be fully clothed like males. I do however hope the dark knight gear looks fitting, personally I think they will take note of Batgirl new 52 in this situation, she doesn't wear little clothing, just tighter by design.

I believe males and females should just get the same armor and then have customization on that armor to remove pieces of it. For example, male dragoon have the revealing features of the female dragoon set as a customization option - vice versa.