I'd rather not see RDM have a spell named "Verultima". Function wise, it's fine--an AoE Finisher, but call it something unique. Ardor for example? Or it could be that thang that Alisae does in 3.2, a big white circular energy slash, Chant du Cygne (since the name hasn't been used for Zwerchau).
How about a "Meditate" channeled oGCD stance for RDM called "Temper" (like the spell in FF1 that RDM could cast, and their unique spell in FFXI). While channeling it, your Black and White Mana increase by 3/3 every tick for 10 seconds. Something to do during downtime like Meditate/Meditation.
Shadowbringers RDM Wishlist
Printable View
-
05-21-2019, 12:49 AMJonnycbad
-
05-21-2019, 12:51 AMADVSSIll take it!Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonnycbad
-
05-21-2019, 12:59 AMJonnycbad
On one hand I want them to remove the potency off of our Corps-a-corps and Displacement to discourage being forced to use it (and subsequently falling off shit), but Displacement has a visible energy slash animation attached to it. They'd have to give it some other effect other than a backstep unless they changed the animation completely and make it a Bind or something...which would be dumb. Or maybe an enmity cut? IDK
-
05-21-2019, 01:05 AMKaliseThey could simply give Displacement/Corps-a-Corps any of a number of minor debuffs.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonnycbad
Heavy? Bind? Slow? Silence? Stun? Blind? Pacification?
Since, irregardless of which one(s) they use, against literally any meaningful target it'll just be "Fully Resisted"
Just as long as they don't put a Stun on Corps-a-Corps because it's bad enough trying to deal with Dragoons and Monks fudging up the ability to interrupt certain annoying enemies without Red Mages also doing the same whenever they want to melee combo >.> -
05-21-2019, 01:06 AMADVSSagree with displacement, but youre right about the animation, it does help the burst combo though, which im guessing was the design. I still would keep displacement, potency or not, it does have its uses in things like 24 mans, etc. Titan? no way will i use it in fights like that unless by accident lolQuote:
Originally Posted by Jonnycbad
-
05-21-2019, 01:11 AMJonnycbadSorry comrade, not to be a grammar nazi but that is not a word.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kalise
You can use:
-Regardless
-Irrespective
But irregardless is a double negative lol.
Carry on :-) -
05-21-2019, 01:17 AMKaliseIrregardless is a word.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonnycbad
It is merely redundant since "Irregardless" and "Regardless" mean exactly the same thing. As the "Ir" at the beginning merely duplicates the "Less" from the end. Essentially saying the same thing twice.
Only one triggers people ;) -
05-21-2019, 01:21 AMADVSS
Vergardless of the situation, there isnt really too much id change about rdm besides those couple of things
-
05-21-2019, 01:50 AMArchwizardA name I have suggested for use for the RDM before:Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonnycbad
Final Verdict.
geddit 'cuz ver-
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonnycbad
I agree with Kalise, up until "don't put a stun on Corps-a-Corps". At that point you may as well just say "Don't ever give RDM a stun" since they would be just as culpable as the Dragoons and Monks in any failure to interrupt, and you'd have exactly the same issues from putting a stun on Displacement.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kalise
At least with Corps-a-corps having it, it's an option to the caster to be able to stun from nearly anywhere, and since it's a gap-closer you could always just stand closer to the boss' hitbox if you plan to save it.
Besides, a stun is a rather potent defense in the cases where it is usable, and the RDM is at their most vulnerable when they charge into the fray. As a hybrid melee job, I would argue for our access to that at least, even if folded into another skill.
As for what debuffs precisely though, I don't recommend any that are broken by damage, at least in PvE. I'm a fan of giving Displacement a strong Heavy in addition to reducing the backstep distance and increasing its cast range by the same amount, so that you can both create the same effective distance between yourself and your target (I do love me some kiting) while reducing the risk of endangering yourself if you do use it.
I'd also argue for the snap enmity reduction, so we still have a reason to use it besides damage. -
05-21-2019, 01:57 AMKabooaUnderrated comment.Quote:
Originally Posted by ADVSS