I'm just not that good at photoshop.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Well, I tried.
http://i.imgur.com/XJbmlbm.jpg
Printable View
I'm just not that good at photoshop.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Well, I tried.
http://i.imgur.com/XJbmlbm.jpg
I think this is a pretty important bit. I'm all for unlocking the sets, but I think it's fair that we should respect the opposing side. Reading some of the replies in this thread are downright cringe-worthy in the way people - for lack of a better way to put it - talk down to anyone who wants the sets to stay as they are.
I am all for unlocking the hempen sets for all races. I love my Miq's attire and wish I could use it on Au'Ra.
Of course I need this. Look at my highlander's sig. It's time he need proper undershirt like midlander's :(
Also I'd love to have Elezen's hempen too
Bro I understand your apprehension about it, but there is a whole lot more gear in the game that pushes this much more than the hempen sets that aren't race locked. Your immediate claims of disgust seem a little misplaced. If you're decrying this, are you decrying the other gear in the game? Should the taffeta sets be racially altered too in order to keep certain races (especially since some au ra can push that "questionably of age" line too). This seems to be the only one that comes with the added baggage of "This is wrong because it allows this one group of players the ability to possibly dress provocatively."
We're not trying to silence you; we're asking you not to slam an entire post of mostly non-lala players as perverts and deviants. Especially when your issue seems to be with a larger (and ultimately valid) problem in the game concerning glamour gear.
double post bc character limts are awful: This isn't be trying to be Devil's Advocate here; I am genuinely curious about this. Is the Hempen set really the problem, or are there more inherent issues with the gear sets and female models. Which is another topic for another thread I know, but that might be a good place to start.