The fact it's already happening with mods makes that argument null. At least with this it would be in modest gear.
Printable View
You are so wishy-washy with mod usage. (*≧▽≦)ノシ))
When I first suggested it, you immediately pulled out the "Mods are against the ToS" shtick but now you just pull it out all willy-nilly. What is the narrative you are trying to go for?
I will add this: Mods are player made. If players want something player-side that isn't supported by the devs, they can use them. ٩(。•ω•。)و
In your opinion. I and others disagree, and feel that being able to disable other people's glamours detracts from the game.
As for instant portraits, they're hardly important at all, which was kind of my tongue in cheek point. But at least they're a positive addition by adding to the system and expanding on the social elements of the game, rather than trying to stifle them.
My opinion is that your requested 'feature' would detract from the overall game. In large part because of the fact that it would be more negative than positive, I think there are much better things they could be working on. I don't think your opinion is invalid, I just disagree. Nice of you to discard my opinion because it doesn't align with yours though. Very cool.
People seem to forget that the suggestion was to make glamours toggleable. Therefore, if you don't want to use the feature, you wouldn't have to. It would not affect your game, or the game of any other person who does not wish to use the feature. That's the beauty of choice.
While I don't feel I would use this feature myself, I understand why peopl would. People really are making a big deal about about literally nothing. It does not affect the glamour wearer. It does not detract from the game of people who care about glamour. If you want to see glamours, don't use the feature. It is really as simple as that.
Your glamours aren't your personality.