It's more ridiculous to assume it won't work when there are two examples in which it worked and none in which it didn't.
Printable View
Um, be careful how you are reading this chart. What we see here can also directly correlate with the drop in ISK value due to inflation.
And let me throw yet another wrench into the works:
PLEX is the name adopted for GTC. GTC was implemented 2006 or earlier, long before this graph is monitoring.
Regardless, not only are you trying to align plex with a date on the graph which does not line up, but the prices continually fluctuate to the point where there is no direct correlation between GTC/PLEX and RMT activity.
I don't have the time to read this entire thread (or even the OP), but is this something like what Blizzard did with D3?
Deflation, it's called deflation.
You're wrong. There were GTC's before, but they were not usid ingame. They existed as a string of numbers that would grant you 60 days playtime if entered in the corresponding field in your account mgmt page.
They then developed the idea of sabotaging RMT and started using these as an ingame item, developed the term "PLEX", which means "Pilot License Extension".
In the sense of: Buying gold is not okay. Except, buying gold is okay as long as Blizzard profits. Yes.
It doesn't stop RMT companies. It don't see how it would.
Let's say for the sake of clarity that I was an RMT company owner/manager.
Wouldn't silling gil become more desirable because now players can use the gil they buy to not only gear their character, but also now pay for their subscription? Also, if the in-game item were 100K Gil.. and I could reliably sell 100k for 5 dollars, I could just get my RMT team to purchase the in-game item with the excess gil they farmed.. and thus increase my profits because I no longer have to worry about subscriptions.
I understand the idea for getting more subscribers(players playing), I don't see how it does anything against RMT.
I don't think it matters; SE should just whack moles. If people want to consider this idea, they shouldn't consider it as an RMT counter-measure I think..
But ISK isn't inflated.
I see some furious googling there. You don't sound like someone that would know anything about EVE to be honest.Quote:
And let me throw yet another wrench into the works:
PLEX is the name adopted for GTC. GTC was implemented 2006 or earlier, long before this graph is monitoring.
Regardless, not only are you trying to align plex with a date on the graph which does not line up, but the prices continually fluctuate to the point where there is no direct correlation between GTC/PLEX and RMT activity.
The graph is relevant because the procedure for the trade of GTC was definitely unwieldy and didn't work through the in-game commerce features.
Not only. Fluctuations happen in every market, but the downward trend is absolutely evident. There was no other event around the start date of the graph that could have caused the downward trend, so your wrench isn't as effective as you would like.