I'm quite sure everyone here can detect some misplaced sarcasm when they see it.
And by the way, you seem to consider that 49/100 meta score quite relevant given how much you flap it around. Maybe you should have noticed that all those critics praise the armoury stystems quite a lot, and their main point of complaint is that there's a serious lack of content.
So their opinion is valid for the score, but not for the details?
Quite peculiar.
Oh and by the way:This is another strawman argument. Content doesn't just mean more areas and more monsters, it involves every kind of activity that can be added to a MMORPG: quests, public quests, public companies, hamlet defense, dungeons, raids and so forth.Quote:
FFXIV's' 49/100 meta score can only be attributed to the fact that Ishgard isn't opened up, and there aren't more areas to fight monsters.
