Remove Gender-Locked Class/Weapon Poses

Not sure why there's talk of realism. We literally use magic, and we can run around in a bikini and have the same amount of defense (thanks to glamour crystals) as someone whos wearing a fridge.

People are over complicating this issue. I personally want more weapon idle poses. Yes, give the off sex the idle pose of its compliment, then create an idle pose for ground sit per weapon, or for sitting in chairs. More poses, more idle poses, more customization for fun. Simple as that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Melichoir

I personally want more weapon idle poses.

---

There isn't a problem with this at all. So do I, and I'd guess most other people. What I dislike is that the unique combat poses, giving each job their distinct identity, should be shared with the rest of the jobs.
I like the distinction in the art of the game, the way the Gunbreaker uniquely carries their gunblade on their back during their battle stance and the way the Samurai authentically poses their battle stance creatively separates them from each other and I want it to stay that way.
As for the idle poses, as many as would be added, it would be great.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Savagelf

i brought up the weight argument because of out side knowledge i brought up actors because what may not feel comfort to female actress may feel comfortable to male. this work against have it be add i brought up the fact that it take great deal of money and time to add or remove which what some have argue find postion equal comfortable to female actress may be worth more. the dark knight more anti hero kind a hero that work for shadow use less honor mean to get want need done done. for example why not have female character put point on sword on ground rest on it or something i away open to new emotions i just not sure you really can apply the male to female without it look bad or have to called ifn actor to act those emotion out to make them look nature.

---

Your argument falls utterly flat in a lot of ways.

The gist of it, if I'm reading this correctly, is that 'female models aren't capable of radiating a 'masculine' sense of strength without it looking bad'. Which is a very poor stance to take; especially since male characters are now capable of comfortably boasting traditionally feminine wedding attire and vice versa.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TheVigilant

I like the distinction in the art of the game, the way the Gunbreaker uniquely carries their gunblade on their back during their battle stance and the way the Samurai authentically poses their battle stance creatively separates them from each other and I want it to stay that way.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TheVigilant

Do you understand where the word Samurai comes from and why they look and pose the way they do first?

---

I do and the Katana is a one sided blade, which makes it safer than most blades to rest on the shoulder.

https://www.geishasblade.com/wp-cont.../odachi-01.png

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/0d/69...678cfb833c.gif

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Edax

I do and the Katana is a one sided blade, which makes it safer than most blades to rest on the shoulder.

https://www.geishasblade.com/wp-cont.../odachi-01.png

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/0d/69...678cfb833c.gif

---

That's an idle pose, not a battle stance, there is no problem with it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Edax

If anything, we should have the poses from the other classes as well. SAM should totally have access to the Gunbreaker pose.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TheVigilant

Do you understand where the word Samurai comes from and why they look and pose the way they do first?
Should we ask for all poses being available to all jobs now?
And next should be all weapons and armors, is it?
Aren't you satisfied that you already have all jobs on the same character?

They have wisely chosen to design every job, race and gender with its own fantasy and multiplied their animations thoroughly, and I appreciate it very much.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TheVigilant

That's an idle pose, not a battle stance, there is no problem with it.

---

And you specifically objected to my request for a pose. Hence my reply.