Yes but after you get to rank 45 it becomes a waste of your time to go into Frontlines unless its a win right now. Hell because Immortal Flames almost always loses, I've come to expect to lose. Even when using the pvp exp calculator, I go by the third place tally since that's most likely what I'm gonna get. I'd understand some title or something for 100 and 200 wins, but for a good majority of us that would appreciate those mounts, we'll NEVER see them since we can NEVER get wins. Hell I'm up to at least 239 matches, with only 50 wins. I even had a week a couple months back with almost 50 matches and 1 win. I was beyond furious every match because it meant I couldn't complete the weekly challenge to get that 15% of rank exp bonus.Quote:
Originally Posted by Camate
Grand Companies Win/Loss Chances
Printable View
-
06-14-2015, 03:01 PMJasott
-
06-15-2015, 03:33 AMEtikenSoooo you do get wins... just very rarely. So you will eventually get the mount lol. Just saying...Quote:
Originally Posted by Jasott
Also fyi, you are replying to a thread that is a year old lol -
06-15-2015, 05:50 AMSangheliosMaybe his win ratio isnt thaaaat bad, but i know enough people with 1 win out of 50 games and thats happening to them week by week. Do you still want to tell them "Yaaaaa, but you still get wins, it just takes a bit longer"? Thats stupid, seriously.Quote:
Originally Posted by Etiken
Edit: If you dont believe me:
1 win out of 39 games (2.5%)
http://puu.sh/haBiy/bcabf1bb0a.jpg
1 win out of 56 games (1.7%)
http://puu.sh/haCg8/1462454fe1.jpg
And now fyi, this guy would need 11200 frontlines to get to 200 wins. With 2 games per hour (wich is the average) it would take 5600 hours of playtime for one mount.
You know what happens during that time? The game will be dead, because it will probably take him 10 years to achieve that goal and meanwhile there are 10+ higher tier mounts with even more ridiculous requirements. See the problem? -
06-15-2015, 09:43 AMEtiken
I didnt say it wasnt fair. I was just being silly because he made an emphasis on "never". So chill out haha.
Of course changes need to be made. Only way to enjoy it in the mean time is to try your best to make the best of it. -
06-15-2015, 10:06 AMQCrimsonI understand your frustration, but tbh it doesn't take much to transform what was a pretty bad frontline party (no clue as to what to do, no organization, etc) into a decent one. Try to lead a little bit, make people listen to you, make macros (instructions during the preparation, calls for retreats or LBs), your winrate might not skyrocket but it should make things a little bit better than going in expecting to lose.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jasott
-
06-15-2015, 12:43 PMEtikenTotally agree. Often times what a company may be missing is simply, leadership. Lot of newer plays just go with the flow. Its obvious when we split to go hit the camps and people dont stick together. Leadership macros are where its at.Quote:
Originally Posted by QCrimson
-
06-19-2015, 08:21 AMGeologo
In Ragnarok, maybe It's my opinion but Mael usually has the highest win rate, adders are good on the Secure but if there are not in the party some killers like Rpg Star and few others rarely they win a Slaughter.
Immortal Flames sommetimes rule hard on Slaughter and sometimes really seem to be there just for feeding other GCs, the biggest problem they have is the lack of "professional" healers (obviously we have few of them but they are quite rare) or the party insist on splitting against 2 GC until they do a sandwich with us xD
Back in past when 72 man Secure still popped Immortal Flames was very crappy on it, at the release of Slaugher instead they lustrate their name thanks to the abundance of BLMs xD