What even is this genderlocked nonsense again?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by EdenElsewhere

The pants ARE the issue. Men are always getting slacks. The amount of stocking we get is far far less in comparison too women's, and we have zero option garter/thigh belts.

It works the other way as well. I know plenty of female players who wants pants for female characters.

---

I honestly don't see the problem not gonna lie not everyone is against genderlocking I am actually for it x)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nero-Voidstails

I honestly don't see the problem not gonna lie not everyone is against genderlocking I am actually for it x)

---

Tell me why? Because other than an occasional piece where girls get a dress or show more skin, neither of which that shuld be locked only to women, btw, most glams are already gender neutral?

And some the glams that aren't are sorta stupid. Why do men get pants with the Tycoon? Why do female dragoons get an unnecessary tummy window in full plate armor in the dragoon artifact glamours?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by EdenElsewhere

Tell me why? Because other than an occasional piece where girls get a dress or show more skin, neither of which that shuld be locked only to women, btw, most glams are already gender neutral?

And some the glams that aren't are sorta stupid. Why do men get pants with the Tycoon? Why do female dragoons get an unnecessary tummy window in full plate armor in the dragoon artifact glamours?

---

While you probably didn't see it unless you're reading lots of threads today, this person intentionally misgendered Wuk Lamat's voice actor earlier today in a thread. The source of their opinion seems pretty clear to me.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Atma

While you probably didn't see it unless you're reading lots of threads today, this person intentionally misgendered Wuk Lamat's voice actor earlier today in a thread. The source of their opinion seems pretty clear to me.

---

Oh, ew, thank you for telling me that they're just a horrid person.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nero-Voidstails

can't wait to gety hands on it haha but other then the pants I see no difference really so I don't think it's a problem in itself

---

The pants are literally the entire problem.
I don't want awkward looking skinny slacks with a belt on them that look super close to a ton of things we already have access to, I want an interesting and unique piece of gear that happens to show off a little of my character's skin, this shouldn't be so hard.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by eveninglark

During the recent Live Letter, they had shown the blue and white outfit on a female Viera model, which has the shorts and stocking version of the bottoms. If it's not genderlocked, that'd be great! But judging by the previews, the assumption is easy to draw.

https://i.imgur.com/HtSrwFS.png

---

THANK you, I couldn't find a screenshot of this anywhere last night x_x

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TKMXIV

Well for the crossdressers I hope there are multiple versions in the Wolves den so everyone can choose what they want. (It would mean more stuff to burn PVP currency on.)

---

>_> Shorts on a guy isn't crossdressing, and we even have a VERY few pieces in-game that are almost as short as these already (albeit not as fancy). Though I do appreciate that you at least agree everyone should get nice things.

Going through the show of ungenderlocking old gear to only continue to give frustrating discrepancies between the gendering of new gear. More than disappointing at this point. At minimum we should be given a choice between revealing and not.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by wirebones

Going through the show of ungenderlocking old gear to only continue to give frustrating discrepancies between the gendering of new gear. More than disappointing at this point. At minimum we should be given a choice between revealing and not.

---

It really feels like the rarely used /visor functionality could and should be expanded (and well, of course renamed). There's clearly already something in the spaghetti code that comprises this game to adjust visibility and/or position of positions for meshes. Doesn't seem like it'd be that much of a stretch, especially with improvements they've made, to control materials as well.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Atma

While you probably didn't see it unless you're reading lots of threads today, this person intentionally misgendered Wuk Lamat's voice actor earlier today in a thread. The source of their opinion seems pretty clear to me.

---

Missgendered? where did I when her voice sound like a male sorry

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by EdenElsewhere

Tell me why? Because other than an occasional piece where girls get a dress or show more skin, neither of which that shuld be locked only to women, btw, most glams are already gender neutral?

And some the glams that aren't are sorta stupid. Why do men get pants with the Tycoon? Why do female dragoons get an unnecessary tummy window in full plate armor in the dragoon artifact glamours?

---

the reason isn't much not gonna lie I am just old and have grown in a place where all this is well alots like I don't care over all of they do on some gear in the slightest because yes some are unisex.

to me a dress should be linked to woman or 2B legging should be with the dress because buttcheek xx)

It’s because Square Enix is copying ideas from mods.

You know what looks good on a man? Armor. Where is that? Oh wait, modbeasts don’t wear armor, do they? And most of them are female? Now tell me how bad WoW’s “sprayed on” armor looks when we don’t even have any.