We don't want extra wards!

This is ridiculous. Housing is an advertised feature that also provides utility with gardening, vendors, fc chest, crafting, workshops. More wards doesn’t take away anything from anyone.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Battler-Ushiromiya

I agree thank you

---

You aren't good at this troll thing yet are you? Do not worry... it isn't easy.

Likely a troll post.

I'd like to see every player that wants a house to have one. I don't see how it "takes away" anything from me having my own.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dspguy

Likely a troll post.

I'd like to see every player that wants a house to have one. I don't see how it "takes away" anything from me having my own.

---

Scarcity creates ingenuity and competition which is healthy for a player created market. Limited houses are one of the best features in the game because it respects player agency.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Battler-Ushiromiya

Scarcity creates ingenuity and competition which is healthy for a player created market. Limited houses are one of the best features in the game because it respects player agency.

---

I am fully aware that this is a troll thread, but I'd like to point out that SE is picking the garbage tier combination of scarcity and blocking a player created market.

Who are these "we"? I don't know anyone who is disappointed with the addition of new wards.
Perhaps you're the only one who has such an opinion among thousands of happy and grateful players.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Battler-Ushiromiya

Scarcity creates ingenuity and competition which is healthy for a player created market. Limited houses are one of the best features in the game because it respects player agency.

---

There we have it, ladies and gentlemen, admissions from a RMT trader.

I had no idea scarcity and competition was what SE had in their visions when designing housing for players.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DeNada

There we have it, ladies and gentlemen, admissions from a RMT trader.

I had no idea scarcity and competition was what SE had in their visions when designing housing for players.

---

RMT is against the TOS of Service, the competition for housing in reference is putting in your bid. You may think a lottery hardly constitutes competition, but it's purely competitive by virtue of only allowing 1 winner. Luck is a huge contingent factor in skill, the two cant easily be divorced.

With limited houses it keeps interest in the system and also provides fresh need for furniture from the player market when people vacate and a new person gets their home. If everyone had a house, it would ultimately defeat the purpose. If you thought wards were dead now, they would never be visited after this. It's a good thing that players without homes come to visit wards and admire what they haven't earned yet.

here fishie fishie fishies

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Battler-Ushiromiya

Scarcity creates ingenuity and competition which is healthy for a player created market. Limited houses are one of the best features in the game because it respects player agency.

---

Sorry to burst your bubble but SE does not intend for housing to be a player created market. If they did, there would have been a Real Estate section added to the marketboard or separate NPC set up to coordinate sales.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Battler-Ushiromiya

RMT is against the TOS of Service,

---

So is purchasing with intent to resell even if it's for gil.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by WillIrishclover

here fishie fishie fishies

---

It may be bait but it's bringing additional attention to how some players are misusing the system.

Now if SE would only take some concrete action against those players.