Expert Dungeons

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hyperia

As much as it sucks having two dungeons, I’ll gladly take this vs having that horribly depressing dungeon in it.

---

Does a FFXIV dungeon really make you depressed?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BRVV

Does a FFXIV dungeon really make you depressed?

---

Dead Ends was absolutely depressing. Enemies whose chat bubbles ask you to put them out of their misery are not exactly cheerful.

So... everything has to be happy and smiling for players not to quit? I start to understand the EW writing team...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ThaCa

Expert roulettes are easier than some of the leveling dungeons, it's hilarious.

---

Honestly I'd say they are easier than nearly all of the leveling dungeons outside of the earliest facerolls. 'Expert' is such a poorly chosen name for it

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gemina

Why? When all they are is this...



Remember?

---

Again as usual what are you trying to say

Knowing they are gonna make expert a bad roulette and saying they shouldn’t do that aren’t mutually exclusive statements

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hyperia

As much as it sucks having two dungeons, I’ll gladly take this vs having that horribly depressing dungeon in it.

That was my drop dungeon as it was depressing and made me feel horrible when done. This saves me the 30 min lockout.

---

Why? It's beautiful. Map 1 and 2 are stunning, way better than anything Eorzea offers sightseeing wise imo.
Then again i'm one who sees beauty in collapsed civilizations and destruction. Maybe that is why i love Fallout so much (not 4th) :D

Remember when Expert Roulette wasn't a coin flip past X.1? Pepperidge Farm remembers.

Not surprising, still disappointing.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DrWho2010

if you don't like expert roulette don't do expert roulette. there are many other ways/methods to obtain casuality tomestones for weekly capping. hunts/treasure maps/deep dungeon/HoH, etc etc.

---

By that logic, what's even the point of providing any feedback—something Yoshida has specifically told people to do—when you could boil literally everything down to "If you don't like it. Don't do it/play something else".

It's a pointless cop out to actually fixing a problem.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ForteNightshade

By that logic, what's even the point of providing any feedback—something Yoshida has specifically told people to do—when you could boil literally everything down to "If you don't like it. Don't do it/play something else".

It's a pointless cop out to actually fixing a problem.

---

Where would the 14 community be without pointless cop-outs over valid feedback

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Vahlnir

I do exactly that. I run most everything BUT expert roulette. That doesn't mean it's well designed, however. A "roulette" shouldn't consist of only 2 dungeons. I felt the same way about MSQ roulette before the changes. Like someone else said, why bother making a roulette for 2 instances?

---

I haven't been playing for long enough to understand why we don't have a single Dungeons roulette instead of the current Leveling/x0/Expert/… split.

In the case of the MSQ roulette, I think it's obvious why those instances have been split out from the other roulettes: they're completely out of line with the typical dungeon or trial, with their lengthy, unskippable cutscenes. I want some choice whether I sit through all that, without having to take a penalty.

I can't see how that reasoning applies to Leveling vs. 50/60/70/80 vs. 90 vs. Expert, though. For anything with five dungeons or fewer, I could just select them all by hand if that's the specific content I wanted to run.