4.2 changes & monthly fee

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hynaku

When they do these changes are they going to give back millions of gil that cost that player to buy the house and all items they will loose. Not even sure why there doing these change's when heard there going to have small, medium, and large apartment rooms. Can see now player owns 2 fc house's and player loose one of them. Then everyone in that fc that private rooms to it will loose them and maybe some items that can't be moved or put in storage.

---

No one is losing any houses, since the currently owned houses (both private and FC ones) are grandfathered.

I wouldn't mind them changing the monthly fee so I'm paying in AUD and not EUR...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SigmaOZ

SE has slowly begun to kill Final Fantasy XIV, it will sooner or later go Free to Play, too many changes with the Cash Shop and Account-Wide codes becoming Single-Character!...

SE is trying badly to squeeze our wallets without making the game any better!...

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SigmaOZ

I can't make you see the light if you insist on being blind, prices in the Mog Shop keep on growing higher but if you're still fine with it go ahead and support it, I surely will not, the game doesn't give me enough in return of the money it asks for stuff!...

Heavensward was obviously better than Stormblood and there's no way to change that!...

---

Bolding your words doesn't make your claim more legitimate. Using logic instead would make your argument better.

imo I think its fine how it is with the price. even before that i think taking up a lot of houses was frowned apon anyway..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Joaquin

Hi everyone!

In the middle of all this stupid new housing policy, what I really wonder (and the main reason why I have always thought that they wouldn’t ever make something like this) is:

Shouldn’t they adjust the monthly fee?

The main difference between Entry and Normal Subscriptions is the number of characters you are allowed to play in total and per world. Prior to 4.2 we were allowed to play 8 characters per world. But now, 7 out of those 8 will have a new restriction. Are they going to reduce the monthly fee too?

And I am not talking about an in-game reward. It is the real money we pay what should also be reduced, the very same as the service we get.

After all, what is the real purpose on having alts, besides making with them what we cannot make with our main? Do we really deserve having now, after 4 years, such a cap on them not applied to the fee?

---

*facepalm*

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SigmaOZ

I can't make you see the light if you insist on being blind, prices in the Mog Shop keep on growing higher but if you're still fine with it go ahead and support it, I surely will not, the game doesn't give me enough in return of the money it asks for stuff!...

---

If you feel you're not getting your money's worth the best option is to vote with your wallet and unsub. For those of us who enjoy the game, we're staying subbed. Myself included. Sure, I'll balance it out with other games but even with all these supposed "price hikes", I still feel like I'm getting my money's worth. So I'm staying subbed. What's that phrase again... "You don't pay my sub!"

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sakuraluna

So... we're now expecting bad behavior to be rewarded by letting the flippers and hoarders pay less per month to make up for restrictions placed on all service accounts because of their actions? Nope. Not likely to happen, and IMO doesn't need to. The restriction is being placed to improve quality of life/gameplay for everyone.

---

Makes me think, what if SE were to quadruple the service fee for those who had hoarded houses? So from £8.99/mth to £35.96/mth. Of course, we'd probably need popcorn for the ensuing rage, but aside from that I wonder what would happen?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Joaquin

Snip

---

If you have alts on different worlds they can still be a part of an FC and have their own house.

Just not on the same world, which for that i expect the ability to add alts to your own property.

Before going full doom and gloom, wait for the housing site to go live.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Darrcyphfeid

Nah, not gonna happen. If anything, they'll increase the subscription cost despite offering less content.

It's not just housing, by the way. See also: They're moving item codes from account-wide to single character.

---

Codes have always been ether account-wide or single. XD

I didn't realize housing was so important to people that the real world cost of the game should be changed for new restrictions. It's really not that deep.

First of all, I want to thank all your opinions and ideas. Just to reply some of them:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SDaemon

We paid the same monthly fee prior to housing even existing. Just because I have alts doesn't mean I should be allowed to have more than the 1 house I already own.

---

That is adding new content. Not exactly this thread’s topic, although related. The addition of new content, in terms of gameplay, is something applied to the whole player-base. In 4.2 they are changing, not only the content, but also the way that one specific kind of subscription works.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Krotoan

stupid? Giving a chance to other people is stupid?

---

The measure itself doesn’t give a chance to anyone. It removes, indeed. Read it carefully.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Krotoan

as a point, you CAN pay less if you're willing to not have alts at all. It's just an all or nothing change.

---

What if I have already paid for a 6 month period on a Normal Subscription?