Official GC Unbinding Petition

I love how everyone always wants a frontlines with no GC requirement. It's simple, this should be about making 8-person Wolves' Den. Then subsequently upping the Wolves' Den rewards to be equal to Frontlines and issuing a roulette only queue system for PvP so you had 4-team/8 team Wolves' Den or Secure /Slaughter Frontlines. This is what PvP should be. None of this open world PvP...too much room for trolls...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Miyu20

I love how everyone always wants a frontlines with no GC requirement. It's simple, this should be about making 8-person Wolves' Den. Then subsequently upping the Wolves' Den rewards to be equal to Frontlines and issuing a roulette only queue system for PvP so you had 4-team/8 team Wolves' Den or Secure /Slaughter Frontlines. This is what PvP should be. None of this open world PvP...too much room for trolls...

---

Roulette-only queue system wouldn't work currently because the current PvP roulette doesn't allow parties. It's a solo Q only. Which is another gripe of mine... If they opened up the roulette to small parties I think it would help some of these issues and get more Secure matches going.

Also, Arena and battlegrounds are two separate animals. Not everyone wants to do a straight deathmatch. People like me prefer the strategy an objective-based PvP instance provides.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Red_Wolf

Roulette-only queue system wouldn't work currently because the current PvP roulette doesn't allow parties. It's a solo Q only. Which is another gripe of mine... If they opened up the roulette to small parties I think it would help some of these issues and get more Secure matches going.

Also, Arena and battlegrounds are two separate animals. Not everyone wants to do a straight deathmatch. People like me prefer the strategy an objective-based PvP instance provides.

---

This is true, not that I don't like the idea of 8vs8 wolves den cause that I actually sounds pretty hot. But I've always prefered pvp game modes that made players do something more then ZERG, ZERG, ZERG. I had that at one point, sort of anyway, when old frontlines (secure) was the main pvp mode, but then here we are today and well.....yeah :/

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Miyu20

I love how everyone always wants a frontlines with no GC requirement. It's simple, this should be about making 8-person Wolves' Den. Then subsequently upping the Wolves' Den rewards to be equal to Frontlines and issuing a roulette only queue system for PvP so you had 4-team/8 team Wolves' Den or Secure /Slaughter Frontlines. This is what PvP should be. None of this open world PvP...too much room for trolls...

---

Yeah I always see things like "PvP is dead remove GC restriction"

Uh it's called wolves den.
I'd rather wolves den get made more popular, I find 4v4 a lot more fun then 72 players all in the same spot fighting monsters in MY PVP MODE

/agree with this very much

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Slappah

Yeah I always see things like "PvP is dead remove GC restriction"

Uh it's called wolves den.
I'd rather wolves den get made more popular, I find 4v4 a lot more fun then 72 players all in the same spot fighting monsters in MY PVP MODE

---

Rewards for Wolves Den aren't appealing enough at the moment. Coupled with horrid queues.. :(

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by zeopower6

Rewards for Wolves Den aren't appealing enough at the moment. Coupled with horrid queues.. :(

---

I'm still off the opinion that allied seals should come from PvP as well Wolves den and frontline both. I mean its in the name already >.>. Allied Seals >>>> fighting with your allies. It works xD

Make it apart of the duty roulette and add another roulette for wolves den.

+1 for the roulette in wolves den.
This is the only way to get players back to it, because rewards are actually too low.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Blubbers

Yoshi P does listen to questions asked directly to him, you might remember the video from London Fanfest of a fan asking about the Spriggan hat that she had done a lot of treasure maps looking to find. He said that because she had done so many maps they would add it as a map reward in a future patch.

---

Actually, if you watch again you will see you're incorrect. What happened when she asked was Yoshi looking confused then saying (paraphrased) "but it's already available". He assumed it was in the game as he'd told the developers to put it in. The reason it wasn't available was a *mistake* and the person asking for it simply bought the issue to his attention. It was then rectified.

The Spriggan Hat wasn't added because she asked for it, rather it was because she proved they had mistakenly left it out.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Culfinrandir

Actually, if you watch again you will see you're incorrect. What happened when she asked was Yoshi looking confused then saying (paraphrased) "but it's already available". He assumed it was in the game as he'd told the developers to put it in. The reason it wasn't available was a *mistake* and the person asking for it simply bought the issue to his attention. It was then rectified.

The Spriggan Hat wasn't added because she asked for it, rather it was because she proved they had mistakenly left it out.

---

He's still right about the ADS mount. I was at the vegas fan fest when someone had suggested it, they made jokes about how you would sit on an ads, and look at what we have now.