I thought it was some kind of troll but... I agree with this.
Printable View
I thought it was some kind of troll but... I agree with this.
You mean fictional armour on fictional characters in a video game that most of which is pure fantasy and cannot possibly exist in the real world? Practicality is almost as bad an excuse as trying to justify your dislike by using the "it's not realistic". More than half the women and not just men on female avatars I actually play with choose to glamour their items to look like short skirts, soft and squishy dresses, halter tops and belly showing armour and such by choice even when running dungeons because they think it looks 'cute' so your preference for what you deem fashionable, in good taste or ideal is not the benchmark of which everyone else must comply with.
If wanted practicality or realism then more than half the existing gear in the game would fail that standard including the very armour you do not like and not just because of the tiny gap around the belly either since even without that gap it would still not be practical or realistic. It's funny how dresses made of cotton and wool, leather and such is somehow immune to bursting into flames when hit by a fire spell or does not get cut to shreds when sliced and diced by enemy claws and blades, spikes and such on armours not slicing your throat open when turn your head or impaling yourself all the time when jump or run, sit down or dance, armour and weapons so heavy or big that 'practicality' and 'realism' goes flying out the window despite the fact that armour might cover your belly button or when bombs explode your legs do not fly off even though wearing light armour...
As said earlier the only thing that matters is you have the freedom to change it if do not like how it looks, you already have that freedom creating a male character for the male version, using the gender change potion if can't be bothered to level a male one...even wearing a different armour or glamour change the one you do not like to one you do. But sorry this 'realism' or 'practicality' nonsense can sod off and I have no patience for it being used as an excuse because it's nothing more than a load of hogwash regardless of how harsh I may sound about it.
I agree with OP. I never liked the stomach showing, I wish there was a way to close it.
Uh...the armor being scaled kind of already takes care of the "flexible armor" problem.
Ultimately, there is just no logical way to justify bare skin in combat armor. Cotton cover would be better than bare skin. If she ran past a branch and it skimmed her belly, now she's bleeding.
Not that i have a huge problem with female dragoon armor, FFXIV does a very good job at managing practicality over style. But it always sounds silly when people try to justify extremes of the latter.
Better yet remove male and female characters. Add robots instead.
>Topic about giving men and women the exact same gear options regardless of how practical or skimpy a piece of armor is.
>Suggesting turning everyone into unisex drones as if gender uniformity in gear removes any and all shreds of creativity from the game.
http://i1.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/...53/279/e31.jpg
Double-standards in gear just don't make sense. There's a wealth of gear options out there, why make a special variant one gender or the other?
No thank you. I love that part about the armor.