ST Queue , penalty for not accepting please!

the person who initiated a vote is unable to initiate another vote for a period of time anyway.

Rather then a penalty for not accepting, a better solution would be to keep the same group that was queued up before the cancellation with the exception of those that backed out or did not respond by the time limit.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Squa11_Leonhart

the person who initiated a vote is unable to initiate another vote for a period of time anyway.

---

Yep, half the people here are asking for something that is already implemented. When you see the vote abandon window pop several times it's several people who think it's time to bail.

Also I fully agree on an 1 min penalty whenever someone withdraws.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MeiUshu

you have the other way around, you wait for hours and nothing, then when it pops up you have something else to do or are in the mid of something that you cant leave....should those people be sanctionned? the only solution is...remove kick from any places and enforce more strict sanctions against those that abuse of the system. I prefer people that refuse to log in when it pops then people that log in and after a wipe simply delog as to avoid penalty I have run an entire evening crossing path with that guy that continously did that.

Mei

---

If you can't commit to it, don't queue. If any an emergency arise, then leave the queue. How hard is that ?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MeiUshu

this is probably the most silly post I have seen in a long while. Ever thought for even a second that maybe the guy that initiate teh abandon actually truely believe that there is really no hope ? that is why there is a vote. you submit a proposal and is either accepted or refused...why should there be a punishment for the one that initiate such ???
Mei

---

Because 99% of the time someone randomly initiates a vote it's for their own selfish reasons to exit without penalty. Whenever I've been in a group that genuinely wanted to quit an instance it was discussed before the vote was initiated. You'd think twice about trying to force 23 other people to quit the instance so you don't have to wait to re-enter if there was a penalty for it. Again - my solution would not harm anyone using the vote in the way it was intended. The vote button wasn't added so people can spam it when they want to leave - that's the leave button.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dwill

If you can't commit to it, don't queue. If any an emergency arise, then leave the queue. How hard is that ?

---

it is not hard but if you wait for a long time before you can enter and you have no clues when you going to enter what you do ? nothign ? ..what was proposed which prompted my answer is the silliest thing I have heard, besides the person that withdraw before it enters does no arm to anybody besides the fact that the person that withdrew did it because was unable to commit isnt it what you are asking right ?, you were waiting you will just wait some more, what will happen with that suggestion is that people will enter, sit and wait to be kicked or just leave in the mid of the dungeon leaving you all with no replacement (depending on the class that left) how is that better ?... sometimes you really really should think hard before coming out with some dumb ideas that wont solve anything

Mei

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MeiUshu

it is not hard but if you wait for a long time before you can enter and you have no clues when you going to enter what you do ? nothign ? ..what was proposed which prompted my answer is the silliest thing I have heard, besides the person that withdraw before it enters does no arm to anybody besides the fact that the person that withdrew did it because was unable to commit isnt it what you are asking right ?, you were waiting you will just wait some more, what will happen with that suggestion is that people will enter, sit and wait to be kicked or just leave in the mid of the dungeon leaving you all with no replacement (depending on the class that left) how is that better ?... sometimes you really really should think hard before coming out with some dumb ideas that wont solve anything

Mei

---

Or you could, you know, just withdraw from the queue preemptively and not wait until it pops ? I'd rather wait a few more minutes and have 2-4 withdraws than the 10-15+ we get nowadays. Being minus one or two in ST is really not the issue here, the place can be completed quite easily with a few people missing.

I stand by my point, if you can't commit, don't queue or if an emergency arise, leave preemptively.