They had the opportunity to improve latency for most people in the US and instead they make it objectively worse for everyone living east of Kansas.
Yeah, that was dumb. Good job.
Printable View
They had the opportunity to improve latency for most people in the US and instead they make it objectively worse for everyone living east of Kansas.
Yeah, that was dumb. Good job.
Well at least doing it now means the servers will be stable by expansion release... right? .... RIGHT? /cry
I don't believe the location of game companies really have an effect on where the servers are located. Then again, I could be very wrong. Southern California probably has the largest amount of game companies congested in one area (Blizzard, Riot Games, Obsidian Studios, Atlus to just name a few) so I wouldn't be all too surprised if the servers are truly within the State.
I don't know what people still think SE is sensible.
These are the people that have AST a 20% balance. Just saying.
It's a reasonable guess, though there's no hard evidence one way or another.
Generally speaking, data centres don't share a location with office space. There are some exceptions - particularly if a company has built a large campus-style office complex - but if they haven't, it's likely they're housed separately.
The main reason for this, of course, is that office space / data centre space is typically rented or purchased from someone else. Most buildings are built with one or the other in mind, not both. So the probability of a company like SE, that hasn't built a large complex within the US, magically finding a dual-purpose location that works well for office space and data centre storage, is rather low.
They also own Crystal Dynamics in Redwood City which is closer to the new data center site, not that it actually matters...
It's more likely that they lease space with a data center provider who also maintains a second site just in case of natural disaster, etc...