Not to mention, minors can't legally consent, so it throws the consent thing out the window.
I should have known a bad-faith option would be presented here. This reads as trying to box those of us arguing for clarification into a specific situation, whereas others like JanVanding have raised critical points of consented venues (private chats where consent between the involved parties is clear, etc.)
EDIT: A number of times, things are rather quick to go towards minors. Seems there's a lot of people with an axe to grind, seeing as there's been suggestions of grooming (a serious accusation that can be considered harassment if unfounded), open attacks against unspecific "degeneracy", and even one user later claiming sarcasm over unclear posts that suggest LGBT+ groups should go next because of - again - allegations of child grooming. Not necessarily from you, mind, but scattered amongst this whole thread.
But in an online game, where minors play, and you can't easily determine if someone is actually the age they say they are, and that minors cannot legally consent, then doesn't that throw the "consent between involved parties" thing get thrown out the window a bit here?
I'm fine with ERP if you have substantial grounds for knowing what the age of a person is, in that you two can actually legally be consenting, but engaging in ERP in 18+ player houses that was advertised publicly, you can't really tell just who is coming through the door, and have to take them at their word.
Nevermind, I think we're done here. The "think of the children"ing is too common in this thread, enough to argue that the mention itself is being used to sink peoples' arguments without merit, as a suggestion that they're advocating for unopposed interaction with minors.
Sticking to EDITs because I appear to be capped, but... it continues. A lot of insinuation that there's exploitation of minors and/or grooming, and it's going unchecked.
But this is a global game, so you have to take into account that people may be from areas with higher or lower ages on consent.
The age of consent is 16 in New Zealand, but I'd be uncomfortable with people from countries where the age of consent is 18 sending explicit material to those who are 16 (or potentially 13, as that's the youngest age that a person may play this game at without violating ToS)
And it's not just about "think of the children! Protect the children!", perhaps there could be a lawsuit against FFXIV or an adult if there's complaints filed about explicit material sent to a minor without the adult person realizing. It doesn't just protect the minor, it also protects the adult and the company from facing legal action.
That is because the game has been stated to be considerate with that age range in mind and to act accordingly. Advertising this in a public space like the Party Finder creates a situation in which people not of the appropriate age of maturity can get involved in such activities, with many of them not even understanding the gravity of the decision they're making or the implication as such. Be it obscene or not. None of this is acting in accordance with that in mind.
I wouldn't even care if there were a section specifically for 18+ on the PF which states and highlights the implications in no uncertain terms of opening up such a section which by default wouldn't appear within the default category of the PF. However, there isn't, so yes people will be inclined to morally grandstand and say you should not advertise mature content on a public space such as the PF which minors will have access to such advertisements, and unsolicited. no less
Eh, consent really doesn't go that way. Consent can be withdrawn at any time. Like, if a player went to a brothel, went into a private room, started... But then, for whatever reason, decided they didn't want to do this anymore... Well, the player would to withdraw. If the other player didn't respect what they did... Well, I certainly think they should be reported. 'cause the moment you say you don't want to do something, that's where consent ends.
To be honest its anytging new ans not to be mean or anything
But i think the non Japanese servers gms are overzealot foolish types.. And we need some better reasonable ones both on there and this forum ... Because it not anything new tey do that stuff to people since realm reborn..
I remember back on my first character before heavenward i made a joke in liksa about ill give cookies for some yaoi and got reported for rmt.. Guy coulda looked at it for one secind and knew it was a joke yet ya..
The issue with the fool gms we have on ours is they act just because a report is sent and dont think about rather its reasonable or not before oulling someone in.
Players that are reported over non reasonable things should be banned ..
There needs to be people in gm postions that kniw the difference between a harmless action someone just being a crybaby thst uses report just cuz there feeling hurt or cuz they dont like it and then something thst is harmful.
I dont think this is an issue with the rule themself but non Japanese staff is kinda in the sjw countrys and are overstricked.
Reminder there is literal pole dancing going on in Eulmore.
How about, it's not JUST about the kids? I can probably speak for many others here, most people don't want to see these ads in party finder. It's off-putting. A person should never open their PF and see ads for adult "content", especially in a 13+ game, no matter what kind of mental gymnastics one might use to justify this. Regardless of whether it's the "other" tab or not. SE needs to make better social features, to have a better curated game. The only people who should see these kind of ads are people looking for it, or things like it.
I was 12 when I first started playing MMOs, so I don't think it's too far-fetched for a 13 year old to play this game.
The roleplaying community on Aether at least is extremely closely knit so I can say these discussions are absolutely taking place and the adult venue Runners are mostly taking actions to ensure age verification is in place and that PF advertising is kept clean.
There will always be venues that ignore the advice and still break the TOS, they are in the minority and if they happen to get busted, they will only have themselves to blame.
Except when I open the PF I don't see those. The first thing I see is how I can pay a dude $200 to take my account into TEA. 5 Times.
I have to scroll, and I mean SCROLL, to even get into the "other" section of the PF. If these were being placed until the roulette tab so you'd see it on opening, you'd have a point, but they aren't, they're out of the way.
y'all flagging this stuff as 18+ is literally trying to keep minors out. like. i don't. understand. how labeling something as 18+ is bad. that's what this is about. we're flagging things as 18+, having mature content, etc, so minors know this is not a space for them.
rolling back around to adults would sometimes just like to talk to adults. i would like to sit at the adult's table at thanksgiving so i don't have to hear the kids talking about whatever kids talk about, i would like to talk to adults.
plenty of non-rp fcs are 18+ because they don't want minors in the space. it's totally okay to not want minors in a space.
saying "erpers want to erp with children" is some sever mental gymnastics. not saying none of them do, but those few are disgusting and really don't stand for the rest of us that just want to sit in a tavern venue and talk in character and not feel the need to censor any 'adult talk,' be it sexual or violent or what have you.
Nah, says they started in 2015.
Which would make them 18 now, and suddenly all that time they spent sneaking into brothels can turn onto them so they want them gone cuz now their fun's over.
See, I can to mental gymnastics too. Doesn't mean they're correct or have any basis, right? U-Unless...
In case you're unfamiliar with consent. I have asked him to stop, that is denial of consent and it was spelled out in the clearest terms possible.
He can reply to me but to do so break the terms of service under Harassment policy.
When someone says no, it means no.
While I think a lot of "think of the children" posts are disingenuous, this really isn't the way to argue that. And as someone who ran a Dungeons & Dragons chat and was a part of the storyteller team of a World of Darkness chat, that had rules that required you to be 18+ to make a character and play there... And I know for a fact there were minors there.
And presented in a way that is still PG-13.
On Primal, we don't really have that unity, sadly. Not for the lack of trying, either. It's more that some of the brothels don't really seem to care about role-playing as a whole.
To be fair, I think a lot of the 18+ venues don't really need that tag. For one, if a minor wants to play in an 18+ venue, they will absolutely lie about their age. And I'm not sure if you have suggestive dancing/dialogue or drinking at a venue you really need it... Since you know, unless you're getting more explicit than the game gets (which I think sometimes pushes the envelope of what is allowed in a T-rated game), it's not really needed.
I'm not sure how that is even relevant, considering that people who are expressing concern about such matters relating to in-game content are referring to minors coming across sexual content. Whereas if you don't want someone to respond to you on the forum, there is a very simple solution: ignoring them.
this is by no means an attack on all of them, but it would not surprise me if more than one of the in-game brothels is just someone having decided it was a great way to get gil quickly without caring about any rp aspect to it or how much work actually goes into making one, even in virtual space
Based on what I've been told, there's at least one brothel on Primal that's exactly that. They saw the Kotaku article, decided it was really funny and a great way to make gil, so they switched the focus of their FC... Even alienating old members who weren't comfortable. Although I've talked briefly to the person who runs at least one... They tend to be actually pretty chill. (And I don't think I've seen public ads for their service, either.)
I doubt SE particularly cares about consequences to their players, so much as how it affects the image of their game.