Yeah the reason is because we dont care about 16 year old technologies, we have the 2011 technology and its better than the 16 year old technologies.
Wave race looks horrible, wow looks horrible even in "water".
Your point and thread still fails.
Printable View
Yeah the reason is because we dont care about 16 year old technologies, we have the 2011 technology and its better than the 16 year old technologies.
Wave race looks horrible, wow looks horrible even in "water".
Your point and thread still fails.
Meleena what is your age?
I am older than you.
Ok then let me respond to your prior post where you said, "we dont care about 16 year old technologies, we have the 2011 technology and its better than the 16 year old technologies."
Wave Race 64 has a graphical technology that makes the surface of a body of water reflect the environment around it. Am I correct in assessing your statement as meaning that removing that technology in 2011 makes water look better?
EDIT:::
Hmm... Let me make this easier for you.
IN this info graphic http://i.imgur.com/nmxe9.jpg
Does the water look better in image #5, or Image #8?
It looks better in the last image.
OK, does the water in the last image look better than all the rest?
Yes far better.
Would you please explain what makes the water in the last picture look better than the others? The only reason I ask is because I truly believe you're just trolling; but am giving you the benefit of the doubt, so I'd like to hear your honest opinion as to what about the water in the last pic looks better than the rest.