Level Syncing isn't the best solution

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OurMom

Yes I did and I don't agree with his "everyone" as none of us here have any numbers. However your post and the part I quoted just went the opposite of him but with the same logic. "Nope people aren't doing it because x but because of y instead". So like the person that posted agreeing with you (that no one seems to have a problem with even though they did the same thing I did, wonder why) I decided to post, and give my reason as to why I do or don't do something.

---

And my reason for why I don’t do it is different from yours. I’m failing to see your point, but it seems like you’re arguing semantics. You missed where I never said “everyone”; I said people. That’s not insinuating a majority, unlike the poster I responded to.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HyoMinPark

And my reason for why I don’t do it is different from yours. I’m failing to see your point, but it seems like you’re arguing semantics. You missed where I never said “everyone”; I said people. That’s not insinuating a majority, unlike the poster I responded to.

---

I never said what your personal reasons where for doing it.

You said "people" in this context it's just a more acceptable "everyone". You can't get upset because he said everyone while you do the same thing.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OurMom

I never said what your personal reasons where for doing it.

You said "people" in this context it's just a more acceptable "everyone". You can't get upset because he said everyone while you do the same thing.

---

You’re using your personal reasons to try and disprove my statement, though. Hence why I gave you my personal reason. Personal reasons don’t prove or disprove anything though; they’re anecdotes.

“People” =/= “Everyone”. You’re arguing semantics, and that’s about it at this point. I’m not going to waste anymore of my allotted posts arguing semantics with someone.

I’m not getting upset over it; if you think I am, then you’re reading too much into my comments.

@OurMom yes entire zones most which were instanced that were capped and had boss fights in them that allowed you to progress in the story. Then there's the non instanced zone that depending on where you were on the map you were uncapped or capped. You seriously would walk down a hallway and enter a room n go from one or the other. This went on for years btw. It took them raising the max level cap to remove those caps.

So yeah SE has done this in the past. Let's also try to not forget that they didn't tune the ARR n HW dungeons after they changed our skills at the start of SB.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HyoMinPark

You’re using your personal reasons to try and disprove my statement, though. Hence why I gave you my personal reason. Personal reasons don’t prove or disprove anything though; they’re anecdotes.

---

Ok here's the thing, I don't know where you read where I said your personal reasons aren't valid or disproves anything. I never mentioned your personal reasons for why you run/don't run roulettes.

Quote:

---

“People” =/= “Everyone”. You’re arguing semantics

---

In this context I'm not.

Quote:

---

I’m not getting upset over it

---

Figure of speech, if though it's stated as such I don't actually mean you're upset. Yes I know not everyone will be able to tell that through text. I was doing several other things and didn't pay it much attention until now.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OurMom

You said "people" in this context it's just a more acceptable "everyone". You can't get upset because he said everyone while you do the same thing.

---

:thinking:

By definition and no other qualifiers, "people" need not include "everyone." It's simply a non- numbered plural for more than one person and is vague; it'd need the words "all" or "every" or otherwise something of the same ilk. "Everyone" is all persons.