Well it seems like they've made minor alterations to the new SCH AF:
http://i.imgur.com/rddvDAv.jpg
Compared to this:
http://www.rpgfan.com/news/pictures2...iv_scholar.jpg
Looks like females will have micro miniskirt this time around
Printable View
Well it seems like they've made minor alterations to the new SCH AF:
http://i.imgur.com/rddvDAv.jpg
Compared to this:
http://www.rpgfan.com/news/pictures2...iv_scholar.jpg
Looks like females will have micro miniskirt this time around
I did some adjustments to the AF for some fun and discussion;
Female Dark Knight with minimal changes;
http://i1175.photobucket.com/albums/...ps5a0hqcx0.png
Female Dark Knight with major changes;
http://i1175.photobucket.com/albums/...psdsv7qnnd.png
Which would you prefer?
...I actually really like the second one to be honest with you.
But the original one also looks good. So it's like uhhh lol.
Don't mind me, my inner perv is drooling at the second one.
INNER PERV AHOY.
For the sake of fairness, (although I know we'll see some people pull this off somehow with some creative subligar use...);
http://i1175.photobucket.com/albums/...ps0q1ufxqm.png
Does this make sense when it's on a male? Double standards?
I like both of those Dark Knight alterations. But it also made me wonder, maybe the bellywindows and such are just there so people can on the spot see if it's a male or a female character. Looking at the fully armored female Dark Knight people might not even know it's a female, and I know that for some people showing ones gender is a big deal.
Just a thought I had when looking at those two pictures.