And yet they don't do their main form of damage via range attack weapons that people rarely even make.
Odd, huh?
Printable View
Who said that close combat was going to be the main form of dmg?
I say make the arrow an auto attack, or give them a dagger. Cmon now Yoshi!
Here is a great thread for the AA debate for Archer... :)
I'm fine with AA, but this thread is more for hitting with bare fists.
Archer's attacking with fists is just stupid imo, makes no sense whatsoever. Either have auto-attack arrows, or use the bow as a weapon at close range like staves/clubs are supposedly going to be doing. Can't be that hard to implement
It is common sense for them to have some type of small melee weapon perhaps a knife of sorts. That is why people are saying go with a dagger. Hell even soldiers today who use guns for main combat carry a combat knife with them for when all else fails. For this game it would be a simple immersion mechanic to make the masses happy, I really see no point arguing against it, hell I even offered using a bow for a weapon just for a quick smack. Bows were very sturdy and strong and could be used to deflect a sword or to hit someone who got too close without damaging the bow.
If your close enough to B****slap your foe...your doing it wrong.