Secondly, they took people's second submissions (such as with you, and this is not your fault, as it wasn't you who picked your picture. You deserved to win, but they explicitly told us not to this.) Lastly, while I had this problem, I also want to distance my own affiliation with it to make the point; There are obvious submissions with less composition, less value of the elements, and overall just looked WORSE but with the same general concept, who won. On the other hand, there was a lot of this that went on, but the originals actually looked worse. It was a rare case, but the chronological value of the entries was obviously not taken into consideration, especially when a winning entry that looked worse but had the same exact concepts as another entry is still able to win. This is a huge punch in the face to people who took time and creativity into their entries, and then someone could've copied it, and won.
