Might want to, you know, black out the names in the chat logs on your pics that aren't yours. SE doesn't like people posting other screen names like that. Just saying.
Printable View
Might want to, you know, black out the names in the chat logs on your pics that aren't yours. SE doesn't like people posting other screen names like that. Just saying.
You are using a very unflattering picture in an attempt to "win" the argument, and do not even consider a few things about the two: There is at the minimum a 2 year gap between when Garuda-Egi was created and Midgarsormr was. The Egis are actually a bit more complex models even with their lower res textures due to the fact that their glow will cycle between dim and bright.
All three Egi's have fairly decent models the only real problem I see is the low res texture (which I suspect is part of what allows the shifting glow of her and the others to work) on the flat surfaces of Garuda-Egi.
I, personally, never understood why people hated the egis so much. They look perfectly fine to me. Never really thought egi glamours were necessary either.
To each their own I guess, but I still find it a waste of time/resources to be making glamours for just one class/job.
I like the look of the current Egi's ..
Most of the stuff in the game has bad detail even armor when you zoom in. Also how often would someone actually zoom into their egi? There is no point to it. Most of the time your camera is zoomed out and detail looks fine from a far. I'm not saying the detail is amazing or anything just that zoomed in detail which you will rarely see during combat doesn't really matter.
So far most of your arguments hardly hold any weight to why they should waste resource to make something look better when they could spend that time elsewhere like actual content. Also seems quite a few people so far have said they like the current egi.