Beat me to it.
I remember the Open Beta 1.0 servers going down and the next day the actual game went live...but we all know how that song and dance went...
Printable View
Yes it does. There is this thing called marketing. They will need a specific date to launch the game so the marketing can be effective. My point is if this is decided before beta ends that is a bad idea. (unless phase 4 is essentially a glorified demo)
And plenty of games have a reasonable time between beta and release. Guild Wars 2 beta finished July 22nd and the game launched August 28th.
You don't know much about "that thing called marketing", do you? The very basic notion of marketing (especially on fields like gaming) is to make it flexible. No game besides the smallest ones has a set in stone marketing plan based on a release date that cannot change, MMORPGs even less.
That besides the fact that developers don't go into betas completely blind. By how the first phases will fare they will have an increasingly precise idea of the final release date, and will be able to adjust their marketing plan accordingly.
That's a very small minority of games. For the vast majority of MMORPG, when it goes into open beta, it's pretty much ready for prime time and there are only some final tweaking and stress testing to be done.Quote:
And plenty of games have a reasonable time between beta and release. Guild Wars 2 beta finished July 22nd and the game launched August 28th.
And those few games you mention didn't have a clear roadmap that told their customers that after open beta, you'd get release or an early access at most. I'm not sure what part of this is so hard to understand, really.
Again, advocating that after open beta there will be or there should be a sizable downtime is illogical, and goes against all the facts we have. But some seem to love being misinformative, I noticed.
*sigh*
Sure a release date can change 6 months from release. When it comes to 1-2 months before release and advertisements are going to tv and press the last thing they want is a date change.
ARR already had a roadmap that changed. The current roadmap clearly states "However, given the nature of beta testing (during which we work closely with our customers to improve our products), there may be a need to adjust both the commencement date and the duration of the beta test." Yoshi has stated multiple times they don't want to be completely locked in to a schedule. This is why 1.0 failed. I really hope they take the time they need to make sure launch is successful.
And sure, anyone who has a differing opinion to yours is illogical and misinformative.
Abriael and inrainbows, you need to quit arguing because in reality, you're both right.
Abriael is right in that there should be no significant downtime between the end of beta and the release of the game. Inrainbows is right because the length of the Beta can be adjusted which would put any release date, even were it the day after the beta ends, off schedule.
Yes, they should, and are, take as long as they need to get it right so it doesn't flop. No, there should be no significant downtime between the end of beta and release. Marketing and advertising is flexible enough to deal with any change we may foresee.
You assume that they are going to put advertisement on TV and on press with a release date much before said release, which is most definitely not needed, nor sensical. Especially with MMORPGs, most heavy advertisement is done very shortly before release, AT release or AFTER release. Before then, if any advertisement is made, it can simply carry a "coming soon", as it did for other MMOs.
MMORPGs aren't like offline games that need to concentrate most of their sales in the release window. Quite the opposite, the more the initial influx of players is staggered, the better is for the developer.
That is why they gave us a best case scenario and a worst case scenario. Assuming that they'll go past the worst case scenario just because is, again, completely illogical.Quote:
ARR already had a roadmap that changed. The current roadmap clearly states "However, given the nature of beta testing (during which we work closely with our customers to improve our products), there may be a need to adjust both the commencement date and the duration of the beta test." Yoshi has stated multiple times they don't want to be completely locked in to a schedule. This is why 1.0 failed. I really hope they take the time they need to make sure launch is successful.
Until we have any firm evidence that the worst case scenario will be missed, the release window is between mid april and the end of june. Any other hypothesis is based on hot air. There's absolutely no reason to assume that they'll miss the dates they set on their own as the worst outcome.
It's illogical just like assuming that they'd leave a sizable amount of downtime between open beta and release when they indicated all the downtime in the roadmap, and there's none there.
No. Anyone that purposely goes against *all* the data we've been given, without the slightest indication that the data is somehow wrong, is illogical and misinformative.Quote:
And sure, anyone who has a differing opinion to yours is illogical and misinformative.
There's a difference.
And while I can appreciate wanting the team to take the necessary time for a successful release, hoping for them to go past the worst case scenario they indicated, with the mandatory negative impact on the game's hype and on the players' mood, regardless of the game's state (that they knew better than you when they wrote down the roadmap) is nonsensical and actually damaging.
At the moment, we can either trust the roadmap set by yoshida and the development team based on their knowledge of the state of the game, their system and their marketing plan (because you know, that kind of roadmap passes by marketing as well), or your fantasies based on your wishful thinking.
Guess who's most credible.
I rather not have a specified date for release. Why? Because Open beta is when most players get their hands on the game, and I'm talking the people who never played Final Fantasy 14 before, those who hated FF14, and those who are bit iffy about FF14 to begin with or any mmorpg in general. If Open Beta comes and SE sees a ton of complaints and unhappy players, I would think the most sensible thing for SE to do is to not release the game immediately, much less put stress upon themselves with an exact date for it to be out.
So estimated dates are fine but having exact dates, I rather not. If the game isn't ready to be released it shouldn't be. I rather not a FF14 1.0 again.
When a MMORPG goes into open beta it's pretty much ready. If there are large valid complaints, they'll surface much before open beta or they will be irrelevant.
Open betas are, by all means and purposes, more of a marketing tool for promotion and a stress test than an occasion to make any radical changes to the game.
The problems with 1.0 surfaced a LOT before open beta. The feedback about them was just ignored.Quote:
So estimated dates are fine but having exact dates, I rather not. If the game isn't ready to be released it shouldn't be. I rather not a FF14 1.0 again.
You can pretty much bet your tail that by open beta we'll have a firm release date. Most probably we will earlier than that. Much earlier.
What we need is some one to take up a teaching stance to share how to recognize a troll and once recognized, how to handle them. Anyone? Anyone at all? This could also be treated like an AA meeting where those that cannot resist responding to troll threads can receive the necessary support not to in the future. :D
TBH It doesn't matter if the release happens right after beta, or if they take time to fix bugs first. What matters is that if they launch the game officially the day after the beta (or even the same day) that they post a known issues log that takes into account all the bugs found during beta and actively update the list as stuff is fixed. This time around, we need to know that they are paying attention.
1.0 was fail in so many ways it wasn't even funny.
2.0 has no fails from what's been shown. aside from people might complain fighting is to slow or to fast or whatever.
even if 2.0 is released *to early* it's still not gonna flop like 1.0 did, cause it's much more polished by default.
Many games are not perfect at release. And some people gonna whine and quit, even if game is delayed to be polished further; and we don't care about those people anyways. some people are gonna stick around even if it's not delayed further, because any small issue that's still there by given roadmap, will be fixed after release. And any such issue won't likely be very big.
They will listen to peoples ideas and such ofc, but they aren't gonna make any big game changes, that will delay the game. And by phase 4 the game will be basically finished anyways, with all the alpha/beta feedback changes.
I think 1 month/phase is way to much no matter how you look at it, so i don't think there's gonna be a worst case scenario or worse, with july/later launch. But i'll consider OB, and 1.0 chars to be launch anyways :)
I can see that happening in april-may. Any tweaks during OB doesn't matter, it's not gonna *delay* the game anyways, cause for all purposes it's released already. Only problem would be if they had to wipe cause issues with 1.0 migration.
I don't see any reason for delay after beta either. Most games release right after OB.
Molly has fleas
Never ceases to amaze me at how many people have mean spirits in this game..
Even more sad is how many people support that mean spirit..
Screaming about trolls "while they are actively trolling a topic" lol.. Typical....
I'm just really looking forward to this and I can't stand all these filler games I'm buying, just to hold me over..
Only one game I really want to be playing..
God forbid a person opens his mouth on these forums..
The problem isn't that you opened your mouth. The problem is that you created a new topic when you already got the answer to your question in your first thread.
I'm not sure why some people here actually blasts someone for not knowing every single official post out there. Maybe it makes themselves feel better?
ETA:
based on the roadmap. 4 Phases + 3 debugging phases. Starting mid february. Average length of each phase 2 weeks. 2 x 7 = 14 weeks / 4 weeks per month = 3.5 months past mid feb = June.
I'm just going to shoot in the dark and guess June 11th-13th would be perfect.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCOPuGBg_W0
I just.. had to..
Lol.. Too funny.
A for sure release also depends on feedback and the beta if they do it right this time.. Judging by how things are going, they're doing it the proper way. So the release could be earlier, or even later than they originally plan.
We don't Need Another Hero
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8W4DEMUSeM