A question: What makes a Healer "easy/simple" or "hard/complex"?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ForsakenRoe

God could you imagine how cool it'd be if you could Synastry-share Exaltation's mit effect (at 40% effectiveness on the secondary target) for double TBs?

---

asts could babysit both tanks!

joking aside i am a little torn on that. I'm not 100% sure single plyer % mitigation should be a healers thing, since tanks ought to be responsible for pressing their own mitigation. That being said, I also think its unfair the healer should have to pick them up off the ground if they fail this basic responsibility of tanking

Yeh I'm not suggesting that the healers are entirely responsible for mitigation for the tanks, just that it'd be an interesting extra thing you could do, like how the tanks have the option to use mit on each other rather than themselves

and to keep the balance, WHM can get a 3rd charge of Benison that we didn't ask for/need

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ForsakenRoe

Yeh I'm not suggesting that the healers are entirely responsible for mitigation for the tanks, just that it'd be an interesting extra thing you could do, like how the tanks have the option to use mit on each other rather than themselves

and to keep the balance, WHM can get a 3rd charge of Benison that we didn't ask for/need

---

surely it would be another aquaveil charge?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ForsakenRoe

God could you imagine how cool it'd be if you could Synastry-share Exaltation's mit effect (at 40% effectiveness on the secondary target) for double TBs?

---

I've been asking for Synastry to be fixed like this since Shb. Even if you don't want CI and Exalt to work with it, some one explain to me why A. Benefic never did. (ie - never applied regen/shield to both targets)