IIRC Hrothgar are noting more than features built onto a Roe Body and Viera were Elezan
Printable View
The person didn't say "Add 1 to whatever comes up." The person said "add 1 if it's 0" which would mean #1 would win on 0 and 1.
Likely whatever random number function takes a max number and outputs a number from 0-#. What SHOULD have been done is either
1. Start the entries at 0 and make the max the biggest ID
2. RND(# of entries-1)+1
This is a fairly easy mistake to make with programming because of the differences between random number functions. But it should have been caught in QA for sure.
My guess is they utilized the Cactuar Pot logic for the randomization which does hit 0000.
One: You're a horrible person for wishing joblessness on someone for a simple fixable mistake.
Two: You're completely wrong on the source of the problem anyway, the RNG did fine: https://na.finalfantasyxiv.com/lodes...7fcff58ee4f9c5
Correct. They're the Roegadyn model with a bit of fuzz and then an unique head model. I'm even convinced said head model is the Roegadyn head but with the frontal face aspects having been re-molded to look like felines.
Then all they did was take the bones and make whole new animations with the model.
Wat, armchair experts were wrong!?!?!?
https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/-QUAA...nj1/s-l400.jpg
I wonder if people will admit they were wrong and apologize, or if they'll just move on to something else.
No chance of that happening. By their own statement, it would be an admission that they cannot do:
This is the problem when you speak so confidently based on limited or no amount of knowledge of the nature of the issue itself. Just stay out of it with the hypotheses and leave the work to the people who actually work with the platform.Quote:
12 year old levels of code required to make this work properly.
The time has come for a new MMO to enter the market and shake the grounds.
Would be interesting to see the reaction it causes, no? :)
They say that it was a communication issue between the server that handles the lottery and the server that handles the housing data. Not sure how that is them not saying what went wrong.
Could have been a network issue.
Could have been a database deadlock of some sort (seems most likely if the lotteries were all done at the same time).
I'm not sure that any additional details would necessarily change anything. I guess I'm confused on what more you were expecting.