While I get that Aymeric is a popular NPC, I don't see why people expected his outfit to be unisex. We've known it was locked since the dataminers first found the files for his set.
Printable View
Who is huddling together? You sound incredibly defensive right now. You didn't have the decency to act like a normal person in a general forum, instead you decided to act out as an rp character. Right now, your post reads to me as "People don't agree or like my idea, they must be ill minded people". Sure, some of us have come off as harsh at times, but maybe we decided not to show you the real us? After all, you won't do us the same courtesy.
Edit: As for the bashing on your idea, who exactly is bashing on it? People are simply saying gear should keep gender locks. Something that goes against your opinion is not bashing.
How do you know you're the oldest here? Now you're just assuming things. You seem quite young to me in the way you speak.
As for the rp thing again. No, you're an Au Ra. Esper is not a race here, and being a spawn of Bahamut (despite the title) is lore breaking, impossible.
This is a fun shift from the norm for the General Discussion :3
Balmung gets deleted and...
http://i.imgur.com/lOjGCvw.gif
The floodgates of Odin opens.
Don't delete Balmung...
http://images1.fanpop.com/images/ima...71_469_600.jpg
You'll just make him angry D:
http://vignette4.wikia.nocookie.net/...20070324173042
Gilgamesh is the 'sister server' to Balmung. Or at least it used to be in the early days. A lot of people went there who wanted to get on Balmung but couldn't. I imagine most role-players there have since transferred over, though. So if Balmung were to vanish...Gilgamesh would likely be our next home. ; )
First let me say that you type well for someone who is dyslexic; very few grammatical or spelling errors. I genuinely mean that, learning disabilities are a PitA. But, as you said that you are definitely an English speaker then there are a few things I want to say. I know that constructive criticism might be ‘appalling to hear’ as I have no intention of sugar coating things, but you should know that really am trying to help you.
I assumed you were either using a thesaurus or something like google translate because while many of the words that were peppered throughout your posts were technically synonyms of or simply similar to other, more common words that would have made perfect sense the context that you used them, they themselves were completely wrong when used in the same place.
Is a good example of this. It’s fairly easy to figure out what you were trying to convey through the use of context clues, but 'steadfast' is still very poorly used in this phrase. I assume you wanted to convey that the ideas were long-held or enduring, but steadfast is more commonly used to describe a person or thing that is loyal or dependable. Are the ideas you are referring to loyal or dependable?
Later in that same post, your use of heresy was also not technically correct. In common speech, heresy almost exclusively refers to something that flies in the face of a religious doctrine. The only really applicable use outside of this is for dramatic purposes- you want to place the severity of the divergence of the opinions you are talking about on the same level as religious heresy. If you were attempting to use it to dramatic effect, then I apologize as it would be correct, just incredibly melodramatic.
This entire section of your closing sentence is absolutely not something you would ever hear in everyday speech and really just reads like you were trying very hard to sound educated. ‘Inserting’ conveys the idea of ‘adding’ or ‘contributing’ without actually being a word that would normally be used in the manner in which you attempted to. ‘Propagation’ also has no place in this sentence (it makes even less sense after your use of ‘inserting’.) I understand that you were somehow or other trying to convey the idea of politely spreading or generating conversation, but this sentence is so mangled I’m not even sure how I would edit it to fix it so that it makes sense without starting over from scratch. ‘Mannerisms’ is plain, flat-out wrong here. ‘Manners’ as in etiquette is the word you were looking for but has absolutely nothing to do with ‘manners’ as in behavioral traits, gestures, ways of speaking, or mannerisms.
I picked this particular post apart because it was short but still had several of the key problems that were repeated over and over throughout the rest of your posts. When taken all together, the examples I gave above give the strong impression of one of three possibilities –
You are using either google translate or an English-to-other language dictionary which would have lacked the subtleties to differentiate between these words and phrases that I pointed out and their more correct synonyms and uses. You said English was your first language so this is ruled out.
You are extensively using a thesaurus to look up more impressive-sounding versions of commonplace words but are also, like with a translator books, not grasping the subtle differences in usage. You, again, stated that this wasn’t the case.
You are aware enough of the words to recognize them or know of their existence, but your grasp of them is too loose and you are not familiar enough with their usage to be able to correctly put them into context. This is the only situation that makes any sense to me at this point and, if it is the case, then the good news is that you are half way there. Knowing bigger, less commonly used words is half the battle; you just need to work on understanding them better, especially their subtle differences to everyday words. With a bit of practice you should be able to use them properly.
I know this is a big post to shift through, but I hope you did as I was genuinely trying to help you improve your writing. That being said, I should add that ‘purple prose’ has nothing to do with text or emotes. It is a writer’s term for a style of writing that is overly flowery and showy to the point where it adds nothing to the piece of writing except making it harder to read and understand.
LULBalmung
Cool story, bro.
http://forum.square-enix.com/ffxiv/t...glamours-equal...
You're welcome!!!!
Why is everyone blaming it on Balmung ?
For once we have a nicely writed post on those forums (althougt you could use some spaces ^^") would you prefer a "<3 Aymeric gear for girls gimme gimme !!!!! <3" post ?
As for the issue i'm all for, lift gender lock on glam ! who cares if a girl want a male outfit or a male a girl ourtfit ? come on SE it's 2017 for god sake ! ^^"
Keep it classy Balmung.... not. Never stood a chance
This is true, and even in that situation the females are given preferential access to Aymeric's hair style while male characters cannot use Minfilia's - illogical pricing structure or otherwise.
I do find it disappointing that many players of female characters only care about the problem when it's something they want (and I'm honestly surprised that it's been Aymeric's coat in so many threads, of all things)... but at this point in the conversation I'm not even sure what's being argued any more. The RP approach was cute and novel, though I agree the wording made it hard to understand the point being made. So I'll just say I'm sorry that you had a shock, Kotei, and if you could join us in requesting less genderlocked gear (especially without equivalents) now you understand that it's an issue I think everyone stands to benefit in the long term. The reason they're locking these NPC costumes in the first place is an attempt to atone for treating those with male characters worse historically. We need to fix this issue so everyone gets more clothes.
I swear i'm going to slap everyone who asks for this set to be Unisex.
I mean this commiunity thinks its OK that we have female locked gear but when it comes to male locked gear the community start spitting vemon.
I consider this situation unexceptable we either have unisex gear or male and female gear not unisex and female gear
Ah Balmung...never change
/pats head
The Grown Men must be stopped
OP didn't reference the Mog Station as being run by actual Moogles.
Immersion ruined, 0/10
This was a treat to read. Also, I feel your devastation. Equality for all glamours!!
Please tell me where this forum says 'role play' instead of 'general discussion'. Also it's horrible to role play breaking lore, makes me lose all respect for such players
Edit: The original Bahamut was consorted to Tiamat and had no connection, and no possible means of 'breeding' with Hydealyn, being asexual and only reproducing dragons. Primal likewise had no connection to Hydaelyn, save for destroying her land. If she was somehow born from his aether left behind, she would be created of Bahamut himself, and therefore be part Primal and drain the land of aether. Everyone would be killing her.
See why I hate these lore breaking plays?
As a role-player myself? Being a 'role-player' doesn't give anybody special privileges to avoid them being called out if they post something controversial or difficult to understand. Given your own post history and track record of apologising for the content of some of your own past posts I would have thought that you would be more understanding about that particular issue. I suppose I am mistaken in that regard, though?
Pure blog fodder.
http://i1.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/...lored_4350.jpg
Is this you?
Seriously though, this drivel should be kept to OP's word processor or ingame in a private linkshell or /say chat, wherever the hell they are. If they honestly wanted to complain about the Aymeric chest being genderlocked, there's 5+ threads out there they can do that in instead.
Delete Balmung please
I.. I don't want to live here anymore.
Oh hey look another Balmung topic.
I'm surprised that Lucia's gear and hair is not available. It could have been a female alternative(kinda of?) to Aymeric's, just as long as her hair would have been unisex
*groans to infinity* why is it always my server...
The NPC costumes are for those who want to look like a famous NPC
rule 1 for dressing up like a famous NPC: be on the same gender (or the whole point to look like the NPC is nill)
I enjoyed this read. Thank you Commander Kotei! :)