Quote:
Originally Posted by Lexxuk
Lol
That is why I included 'if', though in hindsight I probably should've put it in caps, bold, underlined and italics!
Honestly, I hope they keep their word and lift all of the restrictions on transfers at that point (don't have to forfeit anything on transfer.)
To be clear, I don't agree with the price of housing; I think it is flawed logic, but it is still a logic.
-
12-17-2013, 05:39 AMDeroth
-
12-17-2013, 05:45 AMdarkstarpoet1even that's not completely true.you should have saw the prices on the new player servers on release. charging people 50k a meld among other things. on the legacy server the profits are down because there is much more competition and with the speed of leveling even more are capping daily(besides today of course).Quote:
Originally Posted by Nuinn
did you not notice how quickly they banned people for having over 8mil right after release on the non-legacy servers? the bad part is even those that they cleared and allowed to return to the game because they did nothing wrong were allowed to get back in game, but se kept the gil those people had earned and se confiscated. -
12-17-2013, 06:00 AMNuinnIf it was RMT money, then I have no qualms about it, of course. Otherwise, you can't fault the players. Not the ones earning gil the legit way at least. Starting ARR with 0 gil is perhaps what SE should have done, to everyone. Not by trying to patch the mess they allowed and continued to allow (they did nothing about people selling primal wins).Quote:
Originally Posted by darkstarpoet1
I'm sure we all will survive the FC hosing issue just fine, even if it stays like this.... with a bitter aftertaste. Too bad it's affecting everyone on every server differently. As I said in another thread, I'd gladly relinquish all my gil if we were to be treated equally. Put me on the server with highest mat prices, don't care just.... don't segregate us because some of us actually worked for our gil and spent it rarely (seriously, what else to spend gil in 1.0 except materia, which wasn't needed, or relics.... if you managed to collect the 9 damn seals from hamlets in the first place). -
12-17-2013, 06:07 AMFaelandaea
Thanks for the entertainment. This was the most entertaining troll thread I have read while waiting for the servers to go live.
1. - The OP is just trolling. he DID read the patch notes and he CLEARLY understood that the prices for housing, etc. were based on the ECONOMY of each server, NOT the status of any player group.
2. - Having read the patch notes and clearly understood their meaning, he comes here to troll and try to rowel into a panic the people who do NOT read patch notes, and only read forums.
News flash, kiddo . . . other people read the patch notes, also, and I say now your attempt to make people think Legacy has ANYTHING to do with server prices is going to be slapped down. Why? because people who speak the truth also state their sources. MY source: http://na.finalfantasyxiv.com/lodest...7af43f3c43828a So just try to come back with your own source saying that Legacy status was a direct implication of pricing. ~laughs~ -
12-17-2013, 06:07 AMdarkstarpoet1that was in a response earlier. when they removed the gil they stated they were doing an investigation into the accounts, but the gil taken would not be returned regardless of the outcome of the investigation.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nuinn
basically "if we took it because of rmt activities we are keeping it, but if we took it and you had nothing to do with rmt we are still keeping it"