Metactirics slaughter!

3.8 is for the original...not arr...from 2010...:/

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Aliena

3.8 is for the original...not arr...from 2010...:/

---

Ah, I was misdirected by my own typing aha

It's unfair to rate a game solely based on it's connection problems.

I havent seen end-game yet but I can tell that leveling is a blast

LOL.

The more fun thing are the bad reviews can be resumed as the follow:

"This game sucks cause i want to play it"

Whoops
/10

and you know there cant be slaughter without laughter.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Troop86

It's unfair to rate a game solely based on it's connection problems.

I havent seen end-game yet but I can tell that leveling is a blast

---

Agreed. Its because people aren't rational. They are simply mad and felt the need to discredit Square Enix at any opportunity they had. Giving something a 0 because you haven't been able to play due to server issues was very childish of them. Considering to review something without bias you would need to have tried different areas of the game first. So if they couldn't login, then they should have waited till they could. SE has already made it clear they will be fixing the issues this week but of course people can't wait. Its always me me me now now now~ Its silly really.

um.. op... http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/fi...a-realm-reborn

looks like they are doing decent to me.

How dare people express their opinions with a bad score because they can't play a product they paid for, this game deserves a solid 10, stop being entitled haters.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Roris

How dare people express their opinions with a bad score because they can't play a product they paid for, this game deserves a solid 10, stop being entitled haters.

---

Because one extreme fixes the other. :rolleyes: