@Devs: Please give us a windowed borderless option.

I was gonna pop in here to say my good friend in beta (identity withheld) told me there may or may not be a borderless windowed option. Looks like that wasn't necessary.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CSLionheart

I was gonna pop in here to say my good friend in beta (identity withheld) told me there is in fact a borderless windowed option. Looks like that wasn't necessary.

---

you still can get ban too even thou is your friend who told you... . :|

i'll just throw in my usual pet peeve frustration:

putting "@devs" in your topic title does not attract devs to it, nor does it discourage discussion (some people use this to say "this topic isn't meant for you").

there are 387264 people here vying for the dev's attention- the best way to get it is to post normally without any expectation of a response.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Seirra_Lanzce

you still can get ban too even thou is your friend who told you... . :|

---

Hey, you misquoted me! That's not what I said! Read my post again!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alhanelem

i'll just throw in my usual pet peeve frustration:

putting "@devs" in your topic title does not attract devs to it, nor does it discourage discussion (some people use this to say "this topic isn't meant for you").

there are 387264 people here vying for the dev's attention- the best way to get it is to post normally without any expectation of a response.

---

Thank you Mr. self-appointed moderator, but your pet peeve is rather inconsequential.

Mine was a question for the devs without any intention to generate discussion (as there really isn't much to discuss). I simply labeled it for clarity. You, the devs or everyone else are very free to ignore the label.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CSLionheart

Hey, you misquoted me! That's not what I said! Read my post again!

---

Nope i didnt misqouted you :P
For clarity sake, if this friend of yours told you the content meaning he broke the NDA and if u didnt spread the word... Haha u can read the beta guidelines. Is said even the third party are not suppose to indulge it either haha

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CSLionheart

Hey, you misquoted me! That's not what I said! Read my post again!

---

I think you mean that you were "misqo'ted".
*Cough*

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CSLionheart

Hey, you misquoted me! That's not what I said! Read my post again!

---

Too late i've called the Rozzers there on there way. Criminal Scum!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Abriael

Thank you Mr. self-appointed moderator, but your pet peeve is rather inconsequential.

Mine was a question for the devs without any intention to generate discussion (as there really isn't much to discuss). I simply labeled it for clarity. You, the devs or everyone else are very free to ignore the label.

---

Such methodology is as I said pointless. It doesn't help the devs find your topic or make anything more clear. I'm not a moderator nor acting like one- this isn't a rule that's being broken, it's something i personally am annoyed by because it has no purpose. Besides, other people had the answer for you- so obviously, there was something to discuss.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alhanelem

Such methodology is as I said pointless. It doesn't help the devs find your topic or make anything more clear. I'm not a moderator nor acting like one- this isn't a rule that's being broken, it's something i personally am annoyed by because it has no purpose. Besides, other people had the answer for you- so obviously, there was something to discuss.

---

I don't see any "discussion", and you saying something is pointless doesn't make it so.

You obviously get annoyed very easily, which makes your annoyance inconsequential.