Devs: Announcing Legacy status = Beta NDA breech?

I'm in the beta..... oopsie.

speaking of legacy... and beta ... a thread vanished today huh? o.O

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JillyBean

speaking of legacy... and beta ... a thread vanished today huh? o.O

---

I think you're imagining things...

I'm in the Gamma test :P

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JillyBean

speaking of legacy... and beta ... a thread vanished today huh? o.O

---

You're right. It's gone. The trolls have been released, take cover!!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Issachar

I'm in the Gamma test :P

---

Damn! that sounds 10x times better then Beta test i want that :]

I think people take things way too seriously when it comes to the part where you cannot reveal your status as a tester. This part is what everyone takes the most caution in, but is the least revealing bit of info about the testing process altogether.

NDAs have it set up in a way where they can cover their asses in all directions. Some parts are not treated as seriously as others. Revealing your status is lumped into one of these instances.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by stanleyyoung

Damn! that sounds 10x times better then Beta test i want that :]

---

Would the release be an "Omega test"?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lolodin

your thinking too hard... if SE already stated legacy is in beta NDA wont compromise you telling someone because SE already said it themselves

---

This. As well as the fact that having Legacy status doesn't ACTUALLY mean you're in the beta, it simply means you're ABLE to be in the beta, but you COULD (if you wanted to for some reason) choose not to participate.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lucke

Would the release be an "Omega test"?

---

Not sure. I think the release would be an Ultima test :]