Arcanist

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Catapult

Prove it!

I see nothing to this effect and your statement contradicts the class > job flow structure.

---

SE said so.
And things are getting reworked in 2.0, so apparently if a class has some skills the Job may lose them

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Renen

SE said so.
And things are getting reworked in 2.0, so apparently if a class has some skills the Job may lose them

---

I said to prove it, not infer it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Catapult

I said to prove it, not infer it.

---

If you want proof, go look for it. But its a pretty wide known fact by now.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Renen

If you want proof, go look for it. But its a pretty wide known fact by now.

---

This is some flawed logic... It's a shame because I see it all the time on the Forums.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Catapult

I said to prove it, not infer it.

---

Stating things = proof on these boards.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Darkhaund

so sad that Carby is LIMITED to ARcanist only :(

---

Well.. if the Armory system is like it is now.. Summoner will have everything an Arcanist will, In which case we will be able to Summon Carby under a Summoners Order.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Catapult

I said to prove it, not infer it.

---

well it came from Big Boss himself Yoshi-p actually so there is no denying about it
you can search the general discussions to find it it was an interview and Q&A

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Raubahn

well it came from Big Boss himself Yoshi-p actually so there is no denying about it
you can search the general discussions to find it it was an interview and Q&A

---

But...we're asking you to prove it because we don't know where this particular interview is. If you could just link to it (and it says what you're saying it does) then I'll admit you're right and you can bask in glory. However, I don't know where this supposed quote is and there are a lot of "interviews and Q&As" to sift though. Since you seem to know which one it was, it'd be much easier for you to find this interview and post a link to it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sol_Aureus

But...we're asking you to prove it because we don't know where this particular interview is. If you could just link to it (and it says what you're saying it does) then I'll admit you're right and you can bask in glory. However, I don't know where this supposed quote is and there are a lot of "interviews and Q&As" to sift though. Since you seem to know which one it was, it'd be much easier for you to find this interview and post a link to it.

---

This.

Too often, it happens that someone on the forums makes an assumption/theory only to have subsequent people assume they were quoting the devs. I follow the dev tracker and have seen nothing. If it's a 3rd party interview, that is a lot of junk to filter through without knowing where to begin. And even then there are potential mistranslations involved. So find the quote to shut me up.

I'd like if they replaced ALL the models in those sections with art. :3 That would be so pretty.