It doesn't matter. And if the NN is removed nothing of value will be lost.
Printable View
It doesn't matter. And if the NN is removed nothing of value will be lost.
Our NN is constantly between 300 and 400 sprouts in peak time, and that's without the preferred server bonus right now. If yours isn't it's because your mentors aren't doing their job at inviting a lot. Inviting new blood is also one of the key ingredients for a successful NN because it prevents staleness.
It would be diametrically opposite, because you wouldn't be able to moderate said chat. The very reason some NNs are successful is precisely because trolls and toxic idiots can be removed on sight.
GMs are useless, and anyway are a different solution for a different problem, they act after the deed and bring possible punishment, but they do not nip a problem in the bud.
I wouldn't mind a feedback system implemented for the true sprouts so they can rate the mentor network or specific mentors
Surely nobody is going to abuse that system.
What those "Fake Mentors" need is a global chat. Give them that, then a good amount of them will move over to the global chat. Which isn't bad IMHO.
Ever heard of "Review Bombing"?
The mentor cap has needed an increase for a long time, this should definitely be looked into.
The mentor cap doesn't need to be increased because the channel doesn't exist for the sake of mentors.
What is needed is a global chat because that's what the majority of players are looking for - a place to chat with other players about whatever. Linkshells don't fill that need because the cap is based on members whether they are online or offline. Linkshells themselves would be improved and a viable alternative if they worked like Novice Network chat does.
I'm totally not opposed to a general chat somewhere as long as NN remains for what it is designed for. One thing they could start with is by making NN chat access opt-in at every login and not be automatic. I do believe it would already solve a lot of the congestion.