104% Scientific Accurate Research - 1.0 vs 2.0 Map Size

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Enkidoh

One thing that makes me curious though, how were you able to do this experiment with 1.0 completely shutdown and inacessable for a decade now? (Unless you're using one of those naughty 1.0 server emulators that are barely more than 1.0 environmental viewers...).

---

I don't know what you're talking about.

Anyway, ever walked around in a forbidden graveyard?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DiaDeem

I don't know what you're talking about.

Anyway, ever walked around in a forbidden graveyard?

---

I think what they are asking, and I am curious about it as well. I mean 1.0 maps havent been around for over 8 years...

Please explain your methodology and where you were able to foot travel across 1.0 maps. if its scientifically accurate, others should be able to replicate your methods and findings using the same material.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kes13a

I think what they are asking, and I am curious about it as well. I mean 1.0 maps havent been around for over 8 years...

Please explain your methodology and where you were able to foot travel across 1.0 maps. if its scientifically accurate, others should be able to replicate your methods and findings using the same material.

---

I was responding with a bit of humor. I also thought it was obvious that I was being sarcastic with "Scientifically accurate" with how I presented the topic and what I explained. I made a post a while ago comparing areas in the two games. There isn't anything special here. I literally just walked from one side of the map to the other, I was just having fun and decided to share the findings. Anyone that wants to walk in 1.0 can look around as to how to do it on Google or YouTube. I don't think this is the place for that.