No. Short is good. I'm trash at this and I'll probably just be losing a lot, so the shorter the matches the better. Just thrash me, give me my currency, and let me que for more pain.
Printable View
No. Short is good. I'm trash at this and I'll probably just be losing a lot, so the shorter the matches the better. Just thrash me, give me my currency, and let me que for more pain.
i think with best of 3, no overtimes, with total respawn per team would be fun too, but 1st the game needs to be balanced ASAP before this become a DRN SAM WAR fest
A single round is just long enough. You think I want to deal with some of these braindead players for more than a single match? I DESPISE losing because my team is too busy being foolish and focusing the tank instead of dealing with the annoying casters on the opposing side. I lost a match earlier because they kept focusing the WAR instead of dealing with the WHM healing, the MCH destroying from afar, or the NIN focusing our SMN. Do you REALLY think I'd want to do another match with those people? I'd rather have immediately left and taken a penalty.
The designers chose game length carefully and well.
How about no?
Knowing how questionable the matchmaking can be, padding out matches would just make it worse. If you lose the initial round, you won't feel very confident winning the next two. If you win the initial round, you'll just want to take your victory and be done with it.