Originally Posted by
Doozer
Relying purely on anecdotal evidence is weak at best. They will never implement anything like that anyway. And "one vote as a collective" means you're taking away votes from the individuals, period. Who would choose what to vote? The party leader? What if someone doesn't agree? What if it's an 8-man party, 7 were a premade, and only 3 actually want to kick the person, but one of those three is the one that gets to 'choose'? Do you expect there to be some kind of internal vote? If not, that's not a vote at all.
Just because people can abuse the vote kick system, that doesn't mean the system should be changed. A vote is a vote. If people agree, the reason for them agreeing doesn't make their vote any less valid.
Oh, and... reporting couples because they kicked you? Yikes. Seems like a knee jerk response, honestly.