and now a ton of the community are crying out that the inactives are ruining it for their transfers, amazing how that works isnt it
Printable View
Yeah, we all know that we shouldn't care about inactives who are easier to turn customer again than completely new customers.
This game is gonna be successful for years with its current playerbase, so nothing shall be done with a greater vision than satisfying the current playerbase that accepted to pay on the road to 2.0 fully knowing this kind of thing will happen.
Yes they are priority, that's what the community wanted and why they were against option 4. That and they didn't have contact with friends outside of the game to coordinate and say:
"Hey buddy, let's go to world 3, k? k."
It's not being vulgar, saying you shat the bed would be vulgar, which is exactly what happened lol.
I couldn't care less about inactives myself, but I personally didn't want the current player pool from my server to be broken up.
Just saying, there are other reason's to want this method of a merger than just "not screwing over inactive players"
I must have hit to close to home. I'm sorry but stop complaining please.
Also I can stand on a pedestal because I was in support of the first choice for server mergers, seen here.
When you find a topic that I supported something to change, then come back and complain after SE coddled me and caved to what I wanted then you can comment like this again. Good day sir.