So you have nothing to say and just reply to something you can use ctrl + f for?
Printable View
...What even are these arguments.
D; Anyways I wonder what pieces they're gonna be unlocking restrictions from. I can't remember when they last did that. Kirimu coat/Uraeus coat and that all the stuff that was released that patch?
Maybe we can roll mages in armour? Battlemages, so to speak, and in example. That would be nice.
maybe they remove the restrictions from the 4.0+ gatherer and crafter gear - doesn't make sense anyway that they have these restrictions, binding gatherer / crafterer materia through killing monsters isn't a thing anymore since 3.0.
To be honest, I'm not sure the quote means what you think it might mean.
The context is talking about Eureka. Which my thinking is most likely "new" gear especially from Eureka will have no job restrictions (minus our Relic/AF3). Again that just seems to be my understanding on the matter. I don't think they're going to go back and redo like a lot of stuff just no longer having role/job restrictions. Though I wish they would on some stuff.
now when you say that... i remember the diadem gear had a random glamour on them. maybe it's similar, you will get a new piece of gear wich is basically a random reskin wich ignores the role restrictions. so you get for example a new monk gear wich looks like the white mage AF gear?
@yami
If it's random like diadem that could be a way to add longetivity to the glamour hunting there instead of unlocking the regular restricted gear.
Who knows how many they unlock but it seemed they were taking notes about the ones we requested removed so maybe we'll get really good ones at first, I hope they start with DOH gear first.
It's not every day someone skips the 2 derailing posts not made by the author and accuses the author of derailing the thread. Nice try scapegoating trying to equalize and dissolve.
You know, if someone helps me to link a more accurate source to help me prove my point, I'd thank them instead of griping about them. I could even learn how to link specific posts instead of the entire page.
I have no idea why you were being unnecessarily rude and defensive when everyone else was polite in pointing out the more accurate source. It's ok to be corrected.