Hmm i think most of the Sch Tint is running through are just casual players... in my fc are people who said sch is the easiest healer to play... what makes me angry, they think they can rely on their faery and everything is going well... i play sch and whm myself - whm for main healing and sch for off healing, playing as off heal i often grp up with an ast from my fc - and it works great, really, really great (Team Khalessi ftw yay :p). I can focus on dots and shadowflare but never lose sight of heavy impact incoming... for me sch (and asts) are way more complex/interessting cls than whms – if you try to be your best. Schs instant heals and mana management just fits great for off heal support imo, while asts and whms toolkits are great for heavy heals.
neverless there are a few really great asts and schs out there who can at least soloheal just as perfect as whms and for me, personally, they should earn much more respect than those common "dps-wanna-be-haha-you-havent-clear-savage?" ones, who often forget that they are still healers in the end... but thats just me... currently im training day for day just to compete with them... :3
in a nutshell: good soloheal schs are still unique.
Changing the Two-Healer Dynamic
Printable View
-
02-10-2016, 09:55 PMNeela
-
02-10-2016, 10:21 PMNekotee
Solo healing a group as SCH is quite hard because of the few mass healing spell or the cooldown of the existing one XD
But it's far from impossible ! Just need to time everything correctly
Even without having Eos out.
...
I'm pissed and amused by some people in my FC saying that they are healer... As SCH...
When they only spam physic or adlo
Got eos out in auto mode and wasting all AF in healing...
Nop... A SCH is much more than being a LAZY healer XD (that's the whm job)
Not managing the fairy is killing like half of your potential -
02-10-2016, 10:24 PMNeelatotally agree with u!Quote:
Originally Posted by Nekotee
about the lazy part, that's what i stated above too - it's funny and frustrating at the same time :3 -
02-10-2016, 11:13 PM_slowpoke_The content is actually rather well designed for the main/off-healer dynamic, with regular damage that a WHM and AST can mostly solo-heal and heavy spike damage that (usually) needs a SCH to mitigate. The fact that you can - through very good planning, extremely well coordinated play, and some unconventional tactics (like using the Tank LB to survive Thordan's Ultimate without shields) - solo heal current content is not a testament to bad encounter design, but to extremely high player skill. Additionally, many fights are designed in a way that damage starts to rack up as the fight drags on, so you'll increasingly need your co-healer. Again, Thordan is a great example, and a major reason people can even solo-heal those fights is because they have enough DPS to skip phases at the end (everything from phase 8 onwards is almost impossible to solo-heal).Quote:
Originally Posted by Tint
That's not a valid comparison, though. Healing is not (primarily) a numbers game, like DPS is (not trivializing the jobs, but this is how the result is measured). Healing, at least in this game, is way more oriented towards knowing fights and planning appropriately than it is towards raw HPS or any other well-measurable numbers. There are very, very few situations in the game where you need constant, heavy healing to stay alive if you're planning appropriately.Quote:
just imagine 2 DDs would be enough for cleareing the top tier raid while it is still relevant. awesome dps check, right?
It seems to me like you just have a fundamental misunderstanding about how SCH works. Good SCHs will spend 50-80% of a fight in Cleric Stance, and that's perfectly okay. Again, they are mostly needed when heavy spike damage happens that must be shielded through, or during split damage situations which are difficult (though not impossible) to solo heal (Preys + Tankbusters in A1S, or the two knights phase in Thordan, for instance). Plus, a SCH contributes healing through their fairy (which they usually have to micromanage to be 100% effective), and can provide mitigation without ever leaving Cleric (Sacred Soil, E4E, Virus). As a main healer, you *will* notice a missing SCH, even if they spend most of the fight in Cleric.Quote:
i have seen so many scholar who are just really really bad. most scholar are not able to heal properly. they just hide behind cleric stance and let the other healer do the work. it seems many people play the scholar just because it's an easy 4 button DD and if you mess up who cares? your damage is just a bonus, it's the fault of the actual DDs if you fail the dps check xP too bad the game allows them to just being carried >.>
You can play a WHM as lazily as you can play a SCH, or you can maximize its potential - which is different from maximizing the potential of a SCH, but IMO equally as challenging. The one thing I would agree on is that the skill floor for a WHM is lower, it's easier to be mediocre at the job than it is to be mediocre as a SCH.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nekotee
-
02-10-2016, 11:53 PMDzian
The healers dynamic isn't much different from the tanks one.
There's a lot of occasions where you don't need 2 tanks and one ends up being a weak dps. Which is essentially no different from the ops 2 healer issue.
And it suffers the same problems as well. I.e
What happens if duty finder pairs up 2 dps healers as the op called them into the healer slots of a group.
That group is going to be lacking a lot of healing power. Especially if those dps healers only have 15-20% of a full healers restorative output
Same with tanks and why they don't vary much. One of the issues with pld is the dps loss from having 2 in the same group. But 2 warriors or 2 darks ldon't share the problem. -
02-11-2016, 12:09 AMWerhusky
Offtopic:
I main SCH and I actually impressed how bad an opinion of SCH healing exists. I experience it in A3S We had last week 2 PUGs helping us out and at one pull the Digitis was derped so our WHM (we have WHM solo until adds) ended up with the healing potency down and I heard on TS from one of the PUGs "This gonna be hard on the SCH". It was during 2 hands phase. Well yes it is not the easiest if you are that very moment using Selene and SCH AOE heals all rely on your stacks (3/min, Indom has 30s CD) and Emergengy Tactics (30s CD) but still not a unmanageable task >.<
A scholar that doesn't know to heal is not worth being called healer.
On topic:
If a fight has large parts where you need almost no healing why not have one healer DPSing? It must happen in agreement though.
I personally only get sad if people ask me to soloheal some parts and then don't even know how to DPS or drop Cleric the moment I see a safe moment to go full burst. Even in a soloheal I am allowed to put DPS but if you leave your coheal soloing unannounced that is not fair. -
02-11-2016, 05:23 AMNathair
You need to be good at your job to solo-heal current stuff, like Thordan, or Savage.
Absolutely doable with two healers, but if you have to solo-heal, you have to bee good, and I believe that's pretty much a fact.
SE has no intention to tune the game around this kind of players, as we've seen, and as they've said.
NìSo now, if I'm paired with someone good enough, what should I do?
/sit till the fight is over? Because overhealing is not a nice thing, and it's a MP waste.
Phisicks+Adlo+Indomitability+Succor+Lustrate, that's all the healing Skills/Spells a SCH has (+ Embrace).Quote:
Originally Posted by Asuras
You can't count Eos, because you don't always have her out, but even with her you just gain another heal.
Its main AoE heals are a 30s cooldowns.
Fairy with Embrace, Eos with Rouse+WD and Fey Illumination.
What you described is a SCH, as other have said.