If could help DF even if Ishgardian is not the Mecenary GC.
Maps are all designed for 3 Factions, they won't change them all just to add a 4th, if they would add another GC the Frontlines will occur just among the first 3 GC who has 8 or 24 players in que.
As I already said and suggested in a lot of old post XD
An example of 2 consecutive FL, considering a lot of adders in que, low immortal flames:
Adders vs Mael vs Ishgard
Adders vs Mael vs Immortal flames
The 4th GC: Will it make or break PvP?
Printable View
-
08-07-2015, 03:13 AMGeologo
-
08-07-2015, 04:17 AMCeveArthuYou are making a huge assumption that only people from the most popular GCs will transferQuote:
Maps are all designed for 3 Factions, they won't change them all just to add a 4th, if they would add another GC the Frontlines will occur just among the first 3 GC who has 8 or 24 players in que.
As I already said and suggested in a lot of old post XD
Thats a pretty gigantic and impossible assumption to make, at the end of the day this would split 3 pools of players into 4 pools
Just make it 1 pool, fix queues, fire whoever thought of the gc matchmaking, done -
08-07-2015, 06:42 AMGeologoMy assumption is that in que there are far more people than 72, like sometimes happen, as Immortal flame I can say that sometimes we are the bottleneck, so we have a lot shorter queue pop, and usually on staturdays our queue time rise a lot while the mael one is faster.Quote:
Originally Posted by CeveArthu
I'm in a PvP ls where people usually report FLs pop and you can easily see that the average waiting time is different depending on hour/day/GC (and that DF is broken bacause ignore queue).
This won't fix the lack of players during very late night, but in the other moment of day, it will help.
I'm one who will prefere no GC restriction, but there people wasn't talking about it. -
08-07-2015, 06:56 AMEtiken
All if this is based on the assumption that MSQ = Actual in game changes?