If you feed the bears, they will come helicopter on your porch.
Printable View
Aaaand someone restarted the discussion about spell speed again. Plenty of materials in this forum concerning spell speed (yes, also concerning the "misjudging" thing and the actual casting time differences). There's a search function on the top right of the topic table.
You 2 do realize by replying to this thread you're continuously "feeding" and "restarting" it for more visibility :).
Anyway as far as I know, most SS discussions/analysis are meant for WHMs and not SCHs (general consensus = get Crit and STFU), since OP is a scholar, I've just given my opinion on why Crit is better than SS for Scholars.
P/S : If you really want this topic to die in the fires of Mount Doom, please do not reply anymore.
Well, no, actually. This may actually have the effect I/we want.
For starters: The amount of off-topic posts when it comes to spell speed and the "helicoptering"(?) involved should be an indirect message about the viability of spell speed. Secondly it keeps this topic bumped so the first point I mentioned will stay noticed.
Get accuracy. Even if you don't dps hitting those energy drains is really nice. There is so much spell speed on the gear this tier there isn't much point in stacking it.
I hate spell speed as a scholar..
Since as an amazing single-target healer I need to spam physick/adlo on MT the whole fight, high spell speed makes my mana drains faster. And even though scholars have great MP regeneration, mana is still a big problem when u progressing new contents, because u need lots of over-healing/shielding to raise the party fault tolerance rate to as high as possible.
Plus I dont feel benefiting much from spell speed when I dont have any spell longer than 2.5sec cast time and I have 3 instant Off-GCD heal every minute.
For these reasons, my BiS stats are crit+piety.