potency difference post 2.45 for fuma vs raiton should be 48 with slash debuff
might be better if your mudras are lagging i guess
Printable View
potency difference post 2.45 for fuma vs raiton should be 48 with slash debuff
might be better if your mudras are lagging i guess
Well, I know Raiton does a big number, and definitely wouldnt use Kassatsu for Shuriken instead of Raiton, the problem here is that if on the long run that little GCD time that Raiton steals every now and then does indeed gimpers DPS or not.
Im still curious of wether Shuriken has more to it than what meets the eye...
well, you kinda answered your own question there :/
In the worst-case scenario, you can probably roughly think of a .1 second of Raiton lag costing you .05% of a GCD meaning you're doing .05% less damage over time with your next attack. So you'd need to lose .3 of a second in the worst case scenario (delaying an unclipped Shadow Fang) to make using Fuma worth it. I can't imagine anyone losing more than .5 of a second so it'd be a pretty niche case.
Yea, I suppose that only during laggy times Fuma will win out, huh?
Well, I was just curious so I went to test this out and...
Shuriken is definitely considered physical and therefore still affected by Venoms, in other words its actual potency is 240 + 20% bonus damage, while Raiton is plain and simple 360 potency without venom bonus.
A normal Shuriken is about as strong as 5/6 normal Raiton and still much faster.
So I will stick to Shuriken if in Melee while no Kassatsu, Raiton if Ranged, specially given my latency problems.