So what exactly would this fix? I don't know of many people who have multiple 50s and have the money to buy even one house, much less two.
If anything it wouldn't do much. Those with multiple 50 characters (not just classes on one character) that could afford such on two characters are probably dual (multi) boxing and this would not affect them since they have multiple accounts. Remember a dual boxer earns twice the money from kills and quests and dungeons (if they can manage them), over a normal single account.
Make it 1 House per Account
Printable View
-
09-18-2014, 04:41 AMKaethra
-
09-18-2014, 05:06 AMHopecord
BUT...
That not the issue, I'd ask SE to upgrade their server and introduce more small houses only wards. or instanced houses for all I care. -
09-24-2014, 05:44 AMToodles
I concur. Silly a single person can own multiple houses on a server. I've seen this happen & it's very harmful to the already limited amount of space.
I especially agree with "Friend Housing". -
09-24-2014, 06:20 AMBarboron
Don't agree with this. If someone can spend the time earning the gil, fair play to them. Although I am not sure if a player can buy multiple houses on a single character. I would agree to a one house per character. Why should someone be locked out of content on a second character just because they accessed it on the first?
-
09-24-2014, 06:23 AMToodlesI'm pretty sure what he's asking is they enable you to share your house with your Alt's on the same server, so they wouldn't really be locked out.Quote:
Originally Posted by Barboron
This just serves to help the limited space problems which' the greatest problem with Personal Housing I think. -
09-24-2014, 06:31 AMBarboronAll the same, it means that a person is limited to 1 garden then should they have 2 characters on the same server if this same person could afford a small house on both characters. Although it's not just about gardening, there is the vanity side, or even role-playing among other possible reasons.Quote:
Originally Posted by Toodles
-
09-24-2014, 07:05 AMRennah
Absolutely dislike this. I'd rather see the problem with ward space addressed than see people limited as to whether or not separate characters have separate houses. The RP community in this game IS pretty large, and there are valid reasons there - besides practical applications like gardening access - for wanting more than one house. If they give us enough housing space for everyone, including alts, there's really no concern about how many someone has. I mean, what if someone just wants to decorate multiple houses? Why shouldn't they be able to? So long as it's one per character, I see no problem with it. We just need more wards, ESPECIALLY on the high-population servers.
-
09-24-2014, 07:39 AMFruityTootie
If you limit players to 1 personal house per account what would happen to players, like me, with multiple houses have happen to them :S? I don't want my hard earned gil to be taken :(
-
09-24-2014, 08:10 AMWHS
Some players are just buying up houses then selling them. I don't know how unless they form a fc invite you in it and then transfer ownership to you. But they are sure doing it. Meaning what's to stop someone or a group of ppl buying up lots at 5 mil and then trying to sell them for 20mil cause no lots available? I support 1 house per account per server. Meaning up to 8 characters on one server can share the same house. I too play lotro and that's how it is there and it does in fact work. Nobody should be able to buy more than one house while we have such a huge shortage.
-
09-24-2014, 08:23 AMEdwinLiMost likely you'll get the gil you spent on the extra house back.Quote:
Originally Posted by FruityTootie
Besides why would a player want more than 1 house beyond spamming gardening a mass production level?
The original plan was 1 Housing per character to begin with and 1 Housing per FC.