Warrior is OP

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Juubi

I've grouped with Warriors in Dungeons, they can both thank and do massive dps unlike PLD who are purely tanks

---

When they thank, do you say "you're welcome?"

yea cause in every MMO true tanks arent proactive damage midigators XD ,marus are so OP and are the kings of tanking *eye roll*

This is the cookie cutter generation of gaming. These new guys think there is only one class for every role. This class must be agreed upon by the games top dungeon groups, then the rest of the puppets will follow suit.

Want to tank with a WAR? "No way bro, ERMERGAWD, PLD or GTFO yoloswag!" These people aren't capable of thinking for themselves.

WARs are not bad if they are full Darklight geared with +1s or better is AF2/Allagan

People who say warriors are bad are just bandwagoners who jump on the close minded train like people do with all mmorpgs. Warriors have plenty of practical applications in all areas of the game.

I'd heal a warrior over a paladin any day on Titan. Increase lustrate/benediction/stoneskin effect on warriors in combination with their upped DPS make them a first pick for when I do Titan.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by reality_check

I'd heal a warrior over a paladin any day on Titan. Increase lustrate/benediction/stoneskin effect on warriors in combination with their upped DPS make them a first pick for when I do Titan.

---

All of those skills are equally as effective on a PLD as they are on a WAR.

I think the problem is people like you who have just the weakest understanding of mechanics and the tanking classes think you have some insight as to why everyone else is wrong, including the people playing the class, and you as someone with no experience with the class is right.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hachiko

All of those skills are equally as effective on a PLD as they are on a WAR.

---

People who don't understand healing mechanics and cry that the tank class is broken...

Edit:

Here, let me help you out because you are obviously the one who has no idea how the mechanics work.

Stoneskin and Cure II both cost 266 MP.

At my gear level (relic & full DL with two pieces of i90) my Cure II heals around 1400 HP.

On a similarly geared Paladin my Stoneskin probably will absorb 900-1k HP depending on how they've spent their attribute points.

On a similarly geared Warrior my Stoneskin will absorb EQUAL if not MORE HP than my Cure II. This makes stoneskin more powerful AND more efficient than Cure II. And I don't have to wait for the damage to happen. Stoneskin mechanics will always be more effective than healing because I can cast it BEFORE the damage happens.

Go play both healer classes if you're going to call me on ignorance of mechanics before you cry that Warrior sucks.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Trife

This is the cookie cutter generation of gaming. These new guys think there is only one class for every role. This class must be agreed upon by the games top dungeon groups, then the rest of the puppets will follow suit.

Want to tank with a WAR? "No way bro, ERMERGAWD, PLD or GTFO yoloswag!" These people aren't capable of thinking for themselves.

---

What? You're an idiot making a completely false statement, Scholar and White Mage are both accepted, all the DD are accepted, Warrior is not accepted.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ricky

What? You're an idiot making a completely false statement, Scholar and White Mage are both accepted, all the DD are accepted, Warrior is not accepted.

---

It wouldn't be the first time the mmo community perception of a job's utility is completely off base.

Yoshi-P god of Hydaelyn says warriors need to L2P, obviously QQers are either bandwagoning or doing something wrong.