Can pretty much guarantee the relocation will be to Las Vegas, NV at Switch. Would be pretty much idiocy not to since Vegas has multiple, redundant fiber lines branching out to the rest of the US. CenturyLink, Level3, Cox, and a few others.
Can pretty much guarantee the relocation will be to Las Vegas, NV at Switch. Would be pretty much idiocy not to since Vegas has multiple, redundant fiber lines branching out to the rest of the US. CenturyLink, Level3, Cox, and a few others.
Most datacenters look alike though. I'm in them almost every day for work, I've seen them from many many companies, and they all use the same floor tiles, and the good ones all have the same type of cable management runs above the racks.
Can it get any worse?^^'
Montreal is already very far northeast on the continent. The distance to Australia and New Zealand will in all likelihood decrease, so the ping should decrease as well.
I doubt you'll get to see much of a decrease without VPNs however, because if VPNs are helping, it's usually not a distance issue as much as a routing issue.
Keeping your bold speculation quoted for obvious reasons.
Sacramento would be a horrible decision. Especially when I was stationed near their for 6 years and the issues we had. On top of it being geographically horrible for NA users as a whole.
If they opened a Texas Center end of April, it makes no sense unless SE coordinated with them over a year ago when they started working on the relocation project.
Again my opinion is speculation as well, with some personal xp. We will all find out the truth next week anyway.
Not disclosing it just makes no sense from any standpoint. As soon as it goes live and you see where the connection is going takes all of 10 seconds to see where the IP address is registered in ARIN
Oh that's good wasn't sure on the specifics.